MINEX Forum

Tag: critical minerals

  • Czechia’s Chvaletice Manganese Project Gains Strategic Importance for EU Battery Supply Chains

    Czechia’s Chvaletice Manganese Project Gains Strategic Importance for EU Battery Supply Chains

    A major manganese deposit in eastern Czechia is emerging as a key asset in Europe’s push to secure strategic minerals for electric vehicles and renewable energy technologies. The Chvaletice site in the Pardubice region, once a legacy mining area, is now believed to host the largest manganese reserves in the European Union, according to local reporting.

    The project is being advanced by Mangan Chvaletice, which plans to reprocess historic mining tailings accumulated around the former industrial site. What was once considered waste is now viewed as a valuable secondary resource. The company says the project could eventually produce up to 50,000 tonnes of high-purity manganese per year.

    Manganese plays a critical role in lithium-ion battery cathodes, improving performance and safety in electric vehicle batteries. As demand for battery materials accelerates, securing regional supply is increasingly seen as essential for Europe’s economic resilience and industrial autonomy.

    The Chvaletice project has reportedly achieved key permitting milestones, including environmental approvals and mining licences. Preparatory work for a conveyor system and processing plant is expected to begin later this decade, with full commercial production targeted around 2030. The project could create up to 400 jobs.

    The Czech government has designated the Chvaletice deposit as a strategic mineral resource under national legislation, highlighting its importance for supply chain security. Current reserves are estimated to potentially meet up to one quarter of European manganese demand, with a projected mine life of approximately 25 years.

    Manganese and lithium are both listed as critical raw materials by the European Commission. Beyond Chvaletice, Czechia hosts one of Europe’s largest lithium deposits at Cínovec, as well as tungsten reserves and a history of uranium production, reinforcing the country’s growing role in Europe’s advanced technology supply chains.

  • Türkiye and Uzbekistan Sign Mining Cooperation MoU Focused on Critical Minerals

    Türkiye and Uzbekistan Sign Mining Cooperation MoU Focused on Critical Minerals

    Türkiye and Uzbekistan have signed a memorandum of understanding aimed at strengthening bilateral cooperation in the mining sector, with a particular focus on critical minerals and rare earth elements, officials said on Thursday.

    The document was signed by Turkish Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Alparslan Bayraktar and Uzbekistan’s Minister of Mining Industry and Geology Bobir Islamov. The signing took place following high-level talks in Ankara between Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Shavkat Mirziyoyev.

    According to Bayraktar, the agreement is intended to promote information exchange, research and development, and the implementation of concrete joint projects in the mining sector. He said the memorandum would help advance cooperation in strategically important minerals and support broader economic ties between the two countries.

    Writing on Türkiye’s NSosyal platform, Bayraktar described the agreement as an important step toward achieving the bilateral trade volume targets set by the two presidents, expressing confidence that it would deliver mutual benefits.

    The signing coincided with the Fourth Meeting of the Türkiye–Uzbekistan High-Level Strategic Cooperation Council, chaired by Erdogan and Mirziyoyev at the presidential complex in Ankara. Beyond mining, the two countries concluded a series of additional agreements and memoranda covering cooperation in health, education, culture, transport corridors, energy, higher education, free and special economic zones, as well as economic and financial affairs.

  • US Launches Project Vault to Secure Critical Minerals and Deepens Engagement With Central Asia

    US Launches Project Vault to Secure Critical Minerals and Deepens Engagement With Central Asia

    The United States has stepped up efforts to secure independent supply chains for critical minerals with the launch of Project Vault, a new initiative designed to establish a US Strategic Critical Minerals Reserve and reduce reliance on China. The project, formally approved on February 2 by the Export-Import Bank of the United States, is backed by up to $10 billion in long-term public financing and an additional $2 billion in expected private-sector participation.

    Project Vault will operate as a public-private stockpile, creating reserves of essential minerals and metals used in aerospace, defence, semiconductors, advanced manufacturing, renewable energy, and electric vehicles. Planned storage sites across the United States are intended to buffer domestic industries against global supply shocks, mirroring the role of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in energy markets.

    The initiative reflects Washington’s broader strategy to diversify critical mineral supply chains away from China, which currently dominates global mining, refining, and processing capacity for rare earths. US officials have increasingly framed this dominance as a strategic vulnerability, citing past export restrictions imposed by Beijing as evidence of how mineral supply can be used as a geopolitical tool.

    While Project Vault focuses on domestic resilience, its success depends on diversified upstream supply. In this context, mineral-rich Central Asia has emerged as a key region in US policy thinking. Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan were invited to participate prominently in the 2026 Critical Minerals Summit, underscoring growing US interest in the region as an alternative source of strategic materials.

    Central Asia collectively hosts deposits of more than 25 minerals classified as critical by the United States Geological Survey, including rare earth elements, tungsten, antimony, manganese, chromium, and titanium. Despite Kazakhstan’s long-standing role as the world’s largest uranium supplier and the region’s significant reserves, much of Central Asia’s mineral output remains underdeveloped or exported as raw material, primarily to China and Russia.

    Washington has signalled a shift from purely diplomatic engagement toward commercially driven cooperation. Alongside the traditional C5+1 framework, the US has increasingly relied on business-focused mechanisms such as the B5+1 platform to connect private capital with Central Asian projects. This approach is supported by US agencies including the US International Development Finance Corporation, the US Trade and Development Agency, and EXIM, all of which are expanding financing and technical support for critical minerals projects in the region.

    US officials argue that stockpiling alone cannot resolve supply vulnerabilities without parallel investment in downstream processing and refining capacity, much of which remains concentrated in China. As a result, future cooperation is expected to focus not only on extraction but also on building value-added processing capabilities in partner countries.

    Taken together, Project Vault and the intensified engagement with Central Asia mark a decisive shift in US critical minerals policy. Washington now views the region not just as a geopolitical partner, but as a potential long-term contributor to diversified, market-based supply chains that underpin US economic and national security.

  • DFC Highlights Major Investments at US Critical Minerals Ministerial

    DFC Highlights Major Investments at US Critical Minerals Ministerial

    Senior US and international officials gathered in Washington as the United States reinforced its push to secure critical minerals supply chains at a high-level ministerial hosted by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The meeting, held at the US Department of State, brought together government leaders committed to building secure, resilient, and transparent global supply chains for critical minerals.

    The US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) was represented by Conor Coleman, Chief of Staff and Head of Investments, who took part in discussions focused on mobilising public and private capital for strategic mineral projects. DFC Chief Executive Officer Ben Black said the administration had demonstrated strong leadership in safeguarding access to resources vital to US economic growth and national security, adding that DFC would continue working closely with the White House, Congress, and interagency partners.

    Coleman participated in a plenary session outlining US government funding tools available to support investment in critical minerals. He was joined by senior officials from the Departments of Commerce and Energy, the Export-Import Bank, and the Office of Strategic Capital. The session highlighted how coordinated financing mechanisms can strengthen supply chain security while encouraging private sector participation.

    DFC also outlined a series of recent and ongoing investments. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, state-owned miner Gécamines, through its joint venture with commodity trader Mercuria, has begun shipping around 100000 tonnes of copper committed to the United States, with additional volumes planned for Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

    In Brazil, DFC signed a financing agreement with SVRE Holdings Ltd. for a $565 million loan to expand the Pela Ema rare earths mine operated by Serra Verde, supporting the development of a Western-aligned source of heavy rare earth elements. In Kazakhstan, DFC issued letters of interest for up to $700 million in financing linked to Cove Kaz Capital Group’s investment in the Severniy Katpar tungsten mine.

    The corporation has also closed a $600 million investment in the Orion Critical Mineral Consortium, a $1.8 billion public-private partnership established with Orion Resource Partners and ADQ, designed to deploy flexible capital across critical minerals projects in eligible jurisdictions. In addition, DFC committed $75 million in equity to the United States-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund, matched by the Ukrainian government, to support investment in critical minerals and other strategic sectors.

    DFC said securing diversified and reliable supplies of critical minerals remains central to its investment strategy, as these resources underpin advanced technologies, energy systems, and long-term economic security.

  • United States Strengthens Rare Earth Supply Chains Through Partnership With Kazakhstan

    United States Strengthens Rare Earth Supply Chains Through Partnership With Kazakhstan

    The United States is moving to reinforce its supply of rare earth elements through cooperation with Kazakhstan, following the signing of non-binding long-term partnership agreements between US-based  and Kazakh mining company .

    The agreements were disclosed by , which is currently in the process of combining its business with REAlloys. Further details of the cooperation were reported by Mining Technology.

    The partnership is aimed at securing Kazakh raw materials for REAlloys’ processing facilities. The two companies plan to jointly explore and develop rare earth element deposits in Kazakhstan, with extracted material to be processed and refined before being shipped to REAlloys’ production sites in North America.

    Following around six months of negotiations, the partners identified several promising sites. A central element of the agreement relates to offtake from Altyn Group’s Kokbulak project. More than 350 million tonnes of iron ore are located across an area of roughly 127,000 square kilometres in Kazakhstan’s Karaganda and Kostanay regions. Processing of iron ore tailings is expected to yield concentrates rich in both light and heavy rare earth elements, including terbium and dysprosium.

    To support future deliveries, Altyn Group plans to invest in expanding REAlloys’ processing capacity in the United States, including the country’s only rare earth metallisation facility. The plant supplies a number of government-linked customers and supports demand from high-technology industries.

    Altyn Group Qazaqstan is registered in Kurchatov, Abai Region, and is a subsidiary of UK-based . The company is active in the exploration and mining of gold, silver and rare metal ores.

    From 2025, Altyn Group has also planned to begin development of the Ulken-Karashoky gold-copper deposit in the Abai Region, alongside reported plans to extract gold-silver ores at the Mailikara deposit in Pavlodar Region.

  • Why Central Asia Must Lead on Critical Minerals Cooperation

    Why Central Asia Must Lead on Critical Minerals Cooperation

    Senior officials from more than 50 countries gathered at the White House on February 4 for the United States’ first Critical Minerals Ministerial, marking a symbolic moment for Central Asia’s engagement in global resource diplomacy. Delegations from Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan underscored the region’s long-standing “multi-vector” foreign policy ambitions, but the meeting also highlighted a persistent challenge: turning diplomatic visibility into tangible industrial outcomes.

    While Washington’s message focused on openness and coordination, the imbalance between intent and execution remains stark. China has consistently converted engagement into financed, operational mining and processing projects, typically combining contractors, concessional financing, and long-term offtake agreements. By contrast, Western engagement has largely taken the form of memoranda of understanding and strategic frameworks that signal political alignment but stop short of delivering mines, refineries, or downstream capacity.

    Uzbekistan offers a contrasting model of what project readiness can look like. In March 2025, Tashkent unveiled a $2.6 billion, three-year programme encompassing 76 projects across 28 minerals, with a clear objective of moving beyond extraction toward processing and finished products. The initiative is structured for partners capable of execution at scale, rather than symbolic cooperation.

    The evolving US approach further complicates expectations. Washington is increasingly pursuing techno-economic sovereignty, integrating supply chain security, energy systems, advanced manufacturing, and artificial intelligence into a tightly coordinated industrial policy. Dependencies are reframed as vulnerabilities, and resilience has become a central organising principle. In this context, US engagement abroad is likely to be selective, focusing on de-risked, compliant projects that directly support domestic resilience goals rather than driving industrialisation in partner regions.

    This creates both a constraint and an opportunity for Central Asia. High-level political gestures, including the first-ever C5+1 Presidential Summit in Washington in 2025, have raised the region’s profile. Yet momentum will not emerge automatically from diplomacy alone. To shape outcomes, Central Asian governments and companies must proactively present bankable, project-ready opportunities, particularly through direct business-to-business engagement with US firms.

    Developing midstream capabilities is critical. Exporting raw ore is capital-intensive, logistically exposed, and low-margin. By contrast, refined metals and intermediate products can anchor value locally, create skilled employment, and reduce vulnerability to external supply chain shocks. Without this shift, the region risks deeper path dependency and gradual absorption into China-centric production networks.

    Ultimately, the future of Central Asia’s critical minerals sector will not be decided in Washington or Beijing alone. Strategic autonomy depends on the region’s ability to define priorities, structure viable projects, and act as the primary driver of its own industrial transformation.

  • Austria Extends Mining Licence for Wolfsberg Lithium Project, Boosting Development Certainty

    Austria Extends Mining Licence for Wolfsberg Lithium Project, Boosting Development Certainty

    A key regulatory step has been secured for the Wolfsberg lithium project in Austria, as national authorities granted a two-year extension to its mining licence, strengthening planning certainty for the project’s next development phases. The Wolfsberg project is linked to  and is located in the Carinthia region of southern Austria.

    The licence extension comes at a time of firmer lithium prices and heightened European efforts to secure domestic supplies of critical raw materials. While the regulatory approval provides a stable framework for continued project planning, the transition to production will still depend on external market and financing conditions.

    According to the company, the extended permit supports progress toward establishing a framework for a potential “Decision to Mine,” which is now targeted for completion by the end of 2026. However, any final investment decision will remain conditional on favourable lithium market pricing and the successful securing of project financing.

    Wolfsberg is considered a strategic asset for , which was formed following a business combination with European Lithium. The renewed licence is seen as a crucial enabler for advancing technical and commercial planning, though it does not remove the economic hurdles associated with bringing the project into production.

    The timing of the permit renewal aligns with broader European policy objectives aimed at strengthening raw material security. Wolfsberg is intended to produce spodumene concentrate for use in electric mobility and battery storage markets, in line with the EU’s push to localise supply chains under the .

    Alongside progress at Wolfsberg, European Lithium has recently taken steps to reinforce its corporate position, including divesting part of its stake in Critical Metals Corp. and announcing a diversification move through the planned acquisition of US-based Velta Holding, which owns titanium assets in Ukraine.

    For Wolfsberg, the next major milestone remains the targeted framework for a “Decision to Mine” by the end of 2026, provided market conditions and financing arrangements align.

  • A Strategic Assessment of Promise vs. Reality in Central Asia’s Mineral Development

    A Strategic Assessment of Promise vs. Reality in Central Asia’s Mineral Development

    Central Asia’s role in global critical minerals took a decisive turn at the 4 February 2026 Critical Minerals Ministerial in Washington, where officials from more than 50 countries acknowledged the region as a strategic hub rather than a geopolitical buffer.

    While Washington presented an ambitious framework to advance mineral sovereignty, analysts caution that the region—not the U.S.—must drive implementation to avoid becoming a passive arena for major‑power competition.

    U.S. Strategy: A Vertical Integration “New Order”

    The U.S. vision, centred on the FORGE initiative and the concept of “Pax Silica,” positions minerals and energy as shared strategic assets among trusted partners and offers an alternative to dependency on China.
    Washington differentiates its value proposition in three areas:

    1. Market Stability Through Price Floors
      Proposed tariff‑backed price floors aim to counter predatory market dumping and protect investments in assets such as Kazakhstan’s rare earth reserves.
    2. Vertical Value Integration
      The U.S. framework prioritises domestic processing and refining over raw‑ore exports, enabling Central Asian states to capture more value across the supply chain.
    3. Connectivity Autonomy
      By incorporating the Middle Corridor into initiatives like TRIPP, the West presents routes that bypass Russia and China, reducing geopolitical transit pressures.

    Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan have responded quickly—Kazakhstan has declared critical minerals the “new oil” and joined the Abraham Accords to strengthen supply‑chain integration, while Uzbekistan has pursued strategic MOUs to modernise mining and secure battery‑metal supply chains.

    Reality Check: Gaps Between Intent and Implementation

    Despite strong rhetoric, Western engagement has largely taken the form of frameworks and MoUs—not operational projects.

    Three challenges persist:

    • Operational Disparity – China continues to deliver turnkey, financed projects backed by contractors and long‑term offtake agreements, while Western partners emphasise declarations.
    • U.S. Inward Focus – Washington’s drive for techno‑economic sovereignty favours selective, de‑risked engagements rather than proactive industrial development in the region.
    • Execution Gaps – Uzbekistan’s $2.6bn program covering 76 projects illustrates regional ambition, but real progress requires partners capable of building at scale.

    Strategic Imperative: Central Asian Agency

    Experts argue that relying on future U.S. demand is a strategic mistake.
    To convert high‑level dialogue into economic gains, Central Asia must prioritise:

    1. Midstream Capabilities

    Refining and producing intermediary products offer higher margins and reduce reliance on long‑distance transport of low‑value raw ore.

    2. Direct Private‑Sector Engagement

    Regional firms should proactively present project‑ready opportunities to U.S. companies rather than depending on government‑to‑government frameworks.

    Conclusion

    The U.S. “New Order” provides Central Asia with a potential pathway to diversify away from Beijing and Moscow while improving price stability and long‑term sovereignty.
    But success hinges on regional execution. Astana and Tashkent must convert diplomatic signals into tangible midstream capacity—and do so quickly—to secure their strategic autonomy before the current window closes.

  • Ending the ‘Extract-and-Export’ Era: How FORGE and Pax Silica Transform Central Asian Mining

    Ending the ‘Extract-and-Export’ Era: How FORGE and Pax Silica Transform Central Asian Mining

    The 2026 Critical Minerals Ministerial in Washington has signaled the definitive end of Central Asia’s era as a “landlocked” geopolitical afterthought. For decades, the five nations of the region were viewed through the narrow lens of the “Great Game”—a buffer zone between Russian security interests and Chinese infrastructure investments. However, the “New Order” proposed by the Trump administration, articulated by Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, has repositioned Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and their neighbors as the indispensable pivot of a new Western-aligned industrial statecraft.

    The Mineral Sovereignty Pivot

    The strategic argument for Central Asian states to embrace the U.S.-led FORGE (Forum on Resource Geostrategic Engagement) initiative and the proposed Preferential Trade Zone rests on the promise of escaping “coercive dependencies”. For years, Central Asian producers have been vulnerable to the same market distortions Vance identified in Washington: a “foreign supply” (read: China) that floods markets to crash prices and kill domestic projects.

    By joining the new trading bloc, countries like Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are being offered a “necessary foundation for private financing” and a “price floor” enforced by adjustable tariffs. This mechanism is a game-changer for the region. It essentially guarantees that if Kazakhstan develops its potentially world-class rare earth element (REE) reserves—estimated by some to reach 20 million metric tons—its investments will be shielded from predatory pricing strategies designed to maintain Beijing’s monopoly.

    Kazakhstan: The Vanguard of the New Order

    Kazakhstan has moved first and most aggressively to align with this reindustrialization doctrine. President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s branding of critical minerals as the “new oil” is not mere rhetoric; it is backed by a landmark memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the U.S. signed in November 2025, which focuses on technology transfer and processing capacity.

    Perhaps most significantly, Kazakhstan’s accession to the Abraham Accords in November 2025 serves as a profound geopolitical signal. While traditionally a Middle Eastern normalization framework, its expansion to Kazakhstan—the first member with preexisting ties to Israel—is being used to facilitate secure, tech-driven supply chains that reduce the region’s reliance on China. This “unorthodox” alignment places Astana at the heart of the Pax Silica vision, where silicon, minerals, and energy are treated as shared strategic assets among “trusted partners”.

    Uzbekistan and the C5+1 Renaissance

    Uzbekistan is rapidly following this blueprint. On February 5, 2026, during the Ministerial, Tashkent signed its own strategic MOU with the U.S. to secure supply chains for rare earths and critical minerals like lithium, magnesium, and indium. For President Mirziyoyev, this is a path to modernize a mining sector that has often relied on outdated Soviet-era surveys.

    The broader C5+1 diplomatic platform, now celebrating its tenth anniversary, has evolved from a symbolic talk shop into a “pragmatic, project-driven economic coordination framework”. This “renaissance of American influence” is evidenced by the $17 billion in investment projects agreed upon following recent summits and the integration of the Middle Corridor (Trans-Caspian International Transport Route) into the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP).

    The Argument for Central Asian Alignment

    The “New Order” offers Central Asia three structural advantages that neither Moscow nor Beijing can—or will—match:

    1. Vertical Value Integration: Unlike China’s “extract-and-export” model, the U.S. framework emphasizes domestic processing and refining. This allows Central Asian states to capture high-value segments of the supply chain rather than remaining mere “resource bases”.

    2. Market Stability: The Project Vault and price floor mechanisms provide a buffer against “market whiplash”. For a region where commodity price volatility can destabilize entire national budgets, this sovereign de-risking is a vital survival tool.

    3. Connectivity Autonomy: By backing the Middle Corridor/TITR, the U.S. and its partners are providing the region with its first viable route to global markets that does not pass through Russia or China. This reduces the ability of larger neighbors to use transit as a tool of political pressure.

    Central Asia is currently in a “hedging game,” and both Pakistan and Central Asian states have approached these initiatives with a degree of caution to avoid immediate Chinese retaliation. However, the message from the 2026 Ministerial is clear: in an economy of “real things,” those who control the minerals control the future. For Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, the American proposal is not just about mining; it is about finally securing their economic and territorial sovereignty.

  • Kazakhstan Strengthens Global Role in Critical Minerals at Landmark US-Led Conference

    Kazakhstan Strengthens Global Role in Critical Minerals at Landmark US-Led Conference

    Kazakhstan has taken another step toward positioning itself as a key player in the global critical minerals agenda, with Foreign Minister  participating in the first Ministerial Conference on Critical Minerals. The event was held at the invitation of US Secretary of State  and brought together representatives from more than 50 countries to discuss the future of global supply chains.

    The conference opened with remarks from US Vice President  and was attended by leaders of major Kazakh mining companies, highlighting the practical focus of the discussions and growing interest in concrete investment and industrial projects.

    Talks centred on the diversification and resilience of global supply chains for critical minerals, which underpin green energy, high technology, defence industries and the digital economy. Participants stressed that access to these resources is increasingly viewed as a matter of strategic and economic security, prompting calls to reduce dependence on a limited number of suppliers and to expand international cooperation in extraction, processing and logistics.

    Addressing the conference, Kosherbayev outlined Kazakhstan’s substantial potential in critical minerals and its readiness to contribute to stable and reliable global supply chains. He pointed to the country’s significant mineral reserves, established processing capacity, modern infrastructure, political stability and a transparent regulatory environment.

    Kosherbayev noted that Kazakhstan is capable of supplying 20 of the 60 critical minerals listed by the , not merely as raw materials but as value-added products demanded by strategic sectors of the global economy.

    Special attention was given to the implementation of a bilateral memorandum on critical minerals cooperation between Kazakhstan and the United States, signed during a presidential visit to Washington in November 2025. The agreement, the first of its kind in Central Asia, focuses on expanding processing capacity in Kazakhstan, facilitating technology transfer and improving access for Kazakh products to the US market, marking a shift toward deeper integration in global value chains.