Opinion: Daniel de Oliveira, Head of Department at Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia
Portugal has long been an active participant in the European Union’s mineral resources policy and geological surveying initiatives. The timely implementation of the National Exploration Programme (NEP) is not just a regulatory requirement under the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA), but a strategic imperative for maintaining Portugal’s competitive edge in the European critical raw materials sector. The NEP is designed to provide a robust geological knowledge base essential for identifying, assessing, and promoting future mineral resource opportunities. This framework supports evidence-based decision-making for both public authorities and private investors.
The implications of failing to initiate or execute the NEP are significant for Portugal, encompassing legal, strategic, and financial dimensions. As the CRMA is a binding EU regulation, non-compliance would expose Portugal to legal repercussions. However, the strategic consequences could be even more detrimental. The CRMA identifies national exploration programmes as vital for enhancing geological knowledge and pinpointing occurrences of critical and strategic raw materials. Without a proactive NEP, Portugal risks having a diminished evidence base for identifying and advancing future mining projects.
Portugal is uniquely positioned among EU nations, boasting recognized potential for critical resources such as lithium, tungsten, copper, tin, and rare earth elements. A lack of systematic geological updates could hinder the country’s ability to contribute significantly to the EU’s ambitious targets for 2030 and 2050. While the CRMA does not explicitly tie funding to the existence of the NEP, investors and project developers heavily depend on innovative, pre-competitive data generated through national exploration efforts.
The absence of a functioning NEP could lead to several adverse outcomes for Portugal: diminished attractiveness for mineral exploration investments, fewer opportunities to develop projects that could qualify as EU Strategic Projects, and a reduced capacity to engage with European initiatives like the Geological Service for Europe (GSEU) and related critical raw materials exploration initiatives.
Given these potential consequences, the pressing question remains: how much longer can Portugal afford to delay the implementation of its National Exploration Programme?









