Tag: supply chain

  • China’s Rare Earth Export Curbs Threaten to Disrupt Europe’s Auto Industry, Italian Lobby Warns

    China’s Rare Earth Export Curbs Threaten to Disrupt Europe’s Auto Industry, Italian Lobby Warns

    New Chinese restrictions on rare earth metal exports could severely impact Europe’s automotive industry, warned Roberto Vavassori, chairman of Italy’s auto parts association ANFIA, during the ForumAutoMotive conference in Milan on Tuesday.

    Despite a July agreement intended to streamline shipments to Europe, China has continued to maintain tight control over rare earth exports, recently expanding its export curbs even further. The country currently refines and processes the majority of the world’s rare earths, materials essential to key sectors including automotive manufacturing, semiconductors, and defence.

    Vavassori noted that while European manufacturers had so far managed to sustain production despite previous supply cuts, reserves of rare earth metals are now nearly exhausted.

    “That reserves’ buffer is not there anymore,” he said, warning that further disruptions could quickly ripple through Europe’s automotive supply chain.

    Rare earth elements are critical for producing electric motors and other advanced vehicle components, making them indispensable to Europe’s electric vehicle ambitions.

    Although the global rare earth industry is relatively small — valued at less than $5 billion — Vavassori emphasized that its strategic importance far outweighs its market size.

    “This small industry is capable of slowing down the entire global auto sector,” he cautioned.

  • Estonia Opens First Rare Earth Magnet Plan

    Estonia Opens First Rare Earth Magnet Plan

    Europe’s first large-scale rare earth magnet production plant has opened in Estonia, marking a watershed moment in the EU’s efforts to secure supply chains for critical raw materials. The facility, developed by Canadian group Neo Performance Materials at an investment of $75 million, is more than just a factory—it represents Europe’s growing determination to reduce its reliance on China in the race toward renewable energy and electric mobility.

    Why Rare Earth Magnets Matter

    Rare earth magnets are a cornerstone of the energy transition. They power electric motors in vehicles, enable the operation of wind turbines, and play a role in advanced electronics. Without them, scaling up clean technology becomes almost impossible. The challenge is that China has long dominated both the processing and production chains, supplying over 90 percent of the world’s rare earth magnets and an estimated 98 percent of Europe’s demand. This dominance has left industries on the continent vulnerable.

    When Beijing tightened export controls on certain rare earth materials earlier this year, European manufacturers reported severe delays in securing supplies. Such disruptions risk derailing the EU’s aggressive targets for decarbonisation and the expansion of electric vehicle production. As Neo’s chief executive Rahim Suleman put it, “Customer motivations are incredibly high to diversify their supply base and to have localized supply chains.”

    A Strategic Investment for Europe

    The new Estonian plant will initially produce 2,000 tonnes of rare earth magnets annually, with plans to scale up to 5,000 tonnes. While this is still only a fraction of projected European demand—forecast to rise from roughly 22,000 tonnes today to 60,000 tonnes within the next decade—it represents a critical first step toward supply diversification.The facility’s operations are closely linked with Neo’s nearby separation plant, creating an integrated processing hub inside the EU. Raw materials will be sourced from Australia and Malaysia, regions that Europe considers more geopolitically reliable than China.

    Beyond private investment, the project has enjoyed notable public support: a €18.7 million grant from the EU’s Just Transition Fund and a $50 million line of credit from Export Development Canada.European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen underscored the significance, stating that the magnets produced in Estonia are “indispensable to growth and innovation.” Her comments align with the EU’s strategic goal of processing at least 40 percent of its critical raw materials domestically, part of a broader strategy to insulate the bloc from geopolitical shocks.

    Industrial Demand and Auto Sector Stakes

    The automotive sector stands at the heart of the rare earth magnet debate. German auto suppliers Bosch and Schaeffler have already signed contracts with Neo, highlighting the desperation among manufacturers to lock in alternative supply lines. Electric vehicles rely heavily on permanent magnets for motors, making uninterrupted access critical to Europe’s industrial competitiveness.At the same time, Europe faces a delicate balancing act. Producing magnets outside China comes at a cost premium, driven by higher environmental standards, energy costs, and raw material logistics. But as Suleman pointed out, the magnet within an electric vehicle motor represents only a small fraction of the total cost. For carmakers increasingly judged by their ability to produce cleaner vehicles, paying a premium for secure, non-Chinese inputs may soon be seen as a necessary trade-off.

    Europe vs. U.S.: Diverging Paths

    The EU is not the only region scrambling to insulate itself from China’s grip on rare earths. The United States has moved aggressively, fueled by larger federal subsidies and sharper geopolitical confrontation with Beijing.

    Washington has poured billions into rare earth mining and processing projects, while Europe has leaned more heavily on public–private partnerships and industry demand.

    Suleman contrasted the two approaches bluntly: “In the U.S., they’re chasing government money, and in Europe we’re chasing customers—or customers are chasing us.” Europe’s model may take longer to scale, but some argue it will prove more resilient, given that it is anchored in long-term demand rather than temporary government incentives.

    The Limits of Diversification

    Despite bold moves like the Estonian plant, Europe cannot entirely sever ties with China in the near future. Analysts suggest that at best, 30 percent of global rare earth magnet production could shift outside Chinese borders in the next decade, leaving Beijing with enduring dominance. France has spearheaded several projects to challenge this control, but insufficient mining and processing capacity across the continent means Europe will remain dependent on imports.

    Furthermore, the global raw material supply chain itself has bottlenecks. While Australia is emerging as a reliable supplier, and southeast Asia provides alternatives, scaling these sources to cover growing demand will take time, investment, and political stability.

    A Turning Point for Europe’s Green Transition

    The Estonian facility is ultimately a symbol of Europe’s intent to claim greater agency in a strategically vital industry. As electric vehicle adoption accelerates and renewable power scales, the demand for rare earth magnets will only intensify. Neo Performance Materials’ new plant will not solve Europe’s dependency overnight. But by anchoring at least part of the value chain closer to home, it signals to both industry and policymakers that strategic autonomy in essential raw materials is not only desirable but possible.

    For Europe, Estonia is just the beginning. The continent will need more facilities, stronger alliances with trusted suppliers, and coordinated industrial policies to reduce its rare earths vulnerability. The magnet plant may be a modest contribution in terms of tonnage, but geopolitically, it is a giant leap forward.

  • Kazakhstan’s Critical Minerals in Focus at the BKS webinar

    Kazakhstan’s Critical Minerals in Focus at the BKS webinar

    Kazakhstan’s ambition to transform itself into a linchpin of the global critical minerals supply was in sharp focus at the British-Kazakh Society’s (BKS) latest webinar, “Critical Minerals – A Closer Look at Kazakhstan and the Resource Base.”

    Hosted online on 16 September, the event brought together government representatives, leading analysts, and industry insiders to scrutinise the nation’s mineral endowment, discuss its strategy for long-term sustainability, and evaluate opportunities for international partnership and investment.

    Geological Promise and Policy Drive
    In his welcome address, Yerlan Zeineshev, Economic Counsellor at the Kazakhstan Embassy in the UK, underscored the nation’s geological riches—including rare earths, lithium, copper, uranium, titanium, and vanadium—and signalled Kazakhstan’s determination to become “a key supplier for global critical mineral needs.” The country already produces 17 of the 34 critical minerals on the UK’s essential list, with potential to expand further given the right investment and technology.

    Mr Zeineshev highlighted March 2024’s UK-Kazakhstan critical minerals roadmap, emphasising mutual aims for research, private investment, and technology transfer. He pledged continued reform to ensure an open, investor-friendly environment—citing adoption of international best practice in mining codes, long-term investment agreements, and digitalisation of geological data.

    Supply Chain Resilience and Global Partnerships
    Speakers and panellists closely examined how Kazakhstan’s neutral geopolitical stance and its position on the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route position the country as a reliable partner for nations seeking to diversify supply chains. As Enzo Grazella, Senior Analyst at the Critical Minerals Association, noted, this offers both Europe and the UK an alternative source to mitigate risk and reduce overreliance on a handful of global producers.

    The UK government’s updated critical minerals strategy and increased focus on supply chain security were cited as drivers for stepped-up bilateral engagement, particularly in mining, refining, recycling, and advanced manufacturing. Initiatives backed by UK export finance, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), and local reforms are fostering a more attractive investment climate.

    Resource Development and Value Addition
    Arkhat Kurmanbekov, Deputy Director General of Kazakhstan’s National Center for Technology Foresight, outlined the scale of Kazakhstan’s geological survey initiatives, with record levels of exploration funding and ambitious targets to increase the area surveyed to over 2.2 million km² by 2026. The nation aims not only to expand extraction but also to move up the value chain through domestic processing, production of battery materials, heat-resistant alloys, semiconductor materials, and recycling technologies. Industry success stories—such as providing titanium to Boeing and Airbus, or pioneering full-cycle beryllium plants—underline local expertise.

    Market Dynamics, Price Volatility, and Sustainability Challenges
    Caroline Messecar, Strategic Markets Editor at Fastmarkets Metals and Mining, discussed acute market vulnerability arising from concentrated global production—particularly for rare earth magnets vital to electric vehicles and wind turbines. China commands up to 89% of global magnet supply, and recent export controls have forced international markets to scramble for alternative sources, underscoring the strategic importance of new suppliers like Kazakhstan.

    The panel noted that establishing downstream industries (such as magnet manufacturing) requires more than raw materials: it needs multidisciplinary technical skills, transparent and sustainable production, and robust ESG standards. Both Kazakh and UK speakers reaffirmed their commitments to high environmental and social standards, clarifying that responsible development can coexist with commercial viability.

    Whatch the webinar recoding
    Video provided for the MINEX Forum readers by the British-Kazakh Society

  • Kazakhstan to Open Internationally Accredited Rare-Earth Laboratory

    Kazakhstan to Open Internationally Accredited Rare-Earth Laboratory

    Kazakhstan is set to establish an internationally accredited geo-analytical laboratory in Astana to support its growing role in global supply chains for rare-earth metals (REEs).

    Minister of Industry and Construction Yersayin Nagaspayev confirmed that agreements have been reached with global laboratory brands RCI Inspection and PARAGON to certify the new geo-analytical center, which is scheduled to open by mid-2026 under the National Geological Service. The laboratory will house core storage and archival repositories, providing transparent and reliable data to researchers and potential investors.

    The initiative follows President Tokayev’s 8 September address to Parliament, in which he stressed the strategic significance of rare-earth elements for Kazakhstan’s long-term economic future. He directed the government to launch at least three high-tech production facilities for rare-earth metals within the next three years, underscoring their growing importance in global technology and trade.

    The government’s plan outlines four strategic priorities for domestic processing: producing battery materials, recycling, manufacturing heat-resistant alloys for jet turbines, and producing semiconductor materials. To achieve these goals, Kazakhstan is actively forging partnerships with the European Union, the United States, Japan, South Korea, and China.

    Planned projects include a gallium plant, the production of high-purity manganese sulfate and graphite for batteries, and the manufacturing of nickel-based superalloys. Additionally, pilot programs for recycling permanent magnets are set to begin next year, in collaboration with European partners, marking a concrete step towards a more sustainable and value-added rare-earth industry.

  • Torngat Metals Secures Rare Earth Supply Deal with German Magnet Maker VAC

    Torngat Metals Secures Rare Earth Supply Deal with German Magnet Maker VAC

    Montreal-based Torngat Metals has signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with German company Vacuumschmelze (VAC) to pursue a long-term supply agreement for rare earth oxides. The non-binding deal was formalised in Berlin on Tuesday, marking a significant step in diversifying the global rare earth supply chain.

    The agreement was signed by Torngat Metals CEO Yves Leduc and VAC CEO Erik Eschen, with the attendance of Canada’s Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson and Germany’s Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy Katherina Reiche. Both nations have been actively seeking to reduce dependence on China, which currently dominates the global rare earths industry, particularly for technologies such as wind turbines, electric vehicles, and defence systems.

  • EU Clamps Down on China Trade Imbalance Despite Rare Earth Breakthrough

    EU Clamps Down on China Trade Imbalance Despite Rare Earth Breakthrough

    The EU, after a one-day summit in Beijing, struck a tentative deal with China to ease export restrictions on crucial rare earths. However, the bloc remains resolute in its demand for a significant rebalancing of trade relations, amidst lingering tensions over industrial overcapacity and market access.

    Trade Concerns Remain Despite Rare Earth Deal:

    • The EU welcomed China’s rapid-fire approval of rare earth export licenses and a new oversight system for supply chain issues, addressing concerns triggered by Beijing’s earlier restrictions.
    • However, EU leaders emphasized the need for further progress to tackle the €300 billion trade deficit with China in 2024, exceeding the bloc’s acceptance of “fair competition” and calling for greater market access in China for European businesses.

    Key Points of Contention:

    • Market Access: The EU insists on reciprocal market access for its companies, similar to the access enjoyed by Chinese firms in Europe, highlighting persistent discrepancies in access and treatment.
    • Industrial Overcapacity: Brussels remains critical of China’s use of subsidies to fuel domestic industries, creating artificial competition and cutting into European firms’ market share.
    • Ukraine War: The EU criticized China’s support for Russia, accusing it of enabling the ongoing conflict, despite China’s denial.

    Impact of Recent Trade Disputes:

    • The recent trade dispute over electric vehicle tariffs was exemplified by the EU’s imposition of duties on Chinese-made EV imports, followed by retaliatory moves from Beijing targeting EU agricultural products.

    Looking Forward:

    • While the summit yielded progress on rare earths, fundamental disagreements persist regarding trade imbalance, market access, industrial practices, and China’s role in the Russia-Ukraine war.
    • The EU warned that failure to address these issues could compel it to reconsider its openness to Chinese trade and investment.

    Overall Tone:

    The summit signals a mixed bag for EU-China relations. While the rare earth accord offers a glimmer of hope, deep-rooted trade concerns and political disagreements suggest a more complex and potentially volatile future.

  • EU Rearmament Plan Faces Hidden Achilles’ Heel: Critical Raw Materials Dependence

    EU Rearmament Plan Faces Hidden Achilles’ Heel: Critical Raw Materials Dependence

    As Europe escalates its defence preparedness in response to mounting geopolitical tensions, a critical but often overlooked vulnerability threatens to undermine its rearmament efforts: an overwhelming dependence on foreign supplies of critical raw materials (CRMs).

    From aluminium to tantalum, modern military hardware — including main battle tanks, aircraft and electronics — relies heavily on minerals that are scarce or nearly absent in Europe. The European Commission admits that the bloc currently produces just 1% to 5% of its CRM needs, while demand for materials like lithium and rare earths is expected to surge exponentially by 2050.

    A new report by the International Institute for Strategic Studies warns that many of the EU’s potential adversaries — including China, Russia, and Turkey — dominate global supply chains for these vital resources. From 2016 to 2020, China and the Democratic Republic of the Congo led global production of 17 CRMs listed by the EU as essential for civilian and defence technologies.

    Europe’s Critical Raw Materials Act, introduced in 2024, sets ambitious goals to localise 10% of CRM extraction, 40% of processing, and 25% of recycling by 2030. It also aims to ensure no more than 65% of any one material comes from a single country. But industry experts and analysts warn that implementation is lagging far behind targets.

    Rebecca Lucas of RAND Europe calls for deeper diversification and international collaboration, while the Aerospace, Security & Defence Industries Association of Europe (ASD) stresses that access to CRMs is now “indispensable” to Europe’s defence strategy.

    Stockpiling, while increasingly adopted at the national level — notably in France, Spain, and Germany — remains logistically and politically complicated at the EU level. Some materials require strict storage conditions and sensitive handling, complicating bloc-wide coordination.

    The EU is also turning to “trusted” partners like Australia, Canada, and South American countries to fill gaps in supply, according to EPP advisor Gregor Nägeli. But without significant progress in domestic production, recycling, and substitution technologies, Europe’s green and defence ambitions risk being hamstrung by a strategic dependency that rivals — and perhaps exceeds — its former reliance on Russian energy.

  • EU Urged to Prioritise ESG in Central Asia’s Raw Materials Push

    EU Urged to Prioritise ESG in Central Asia’s Raw Materials Push

    The EU must prioritize Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles in its dealings with Central Asia to secure its access to crucial raw materials, commentators warn.

    The bloc arrived in Samarkand this April with a hefty €13.2 billion Global Gateway package, signaling a desire to move beyond merely buying raw materials from the region. A significant portion, €2.5 billion, is earmarked for new mining and processing projects in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and beyond. This drive is born out of necessity: the EU still relies entirely on China for its heavy rare-earth imports and faces the growing risk of vulnerability.

    While geographically late to the game, Europe has a unique advantage: a reputation for robust ESG practices. Local executives cite European partners as “a sign of quality” due to their unwavering adherence to these standards, something often lacking in Chinese or Russian counterparts. However, this edge relies on Brussels consistently embedding ESG into every euro invested. This means robust monitoring and auditing of remediation plans, transparent royalty structures, and genuine upfront consultation with local communities.

    The EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) sets ambitious goals: attaining 10 percent mining, 40 percent processing, and 25 percent recycling of Europe’s annual CRM demand domestically or in trusted partner states by 2030.

    Realising these goals in Central Asia necessitates investment in sustainable technologies. This includes financing water-efficient processing plants, closed-loop waste systems, and solar-powered smelters, rather than simply opening more exploitative mines.

    The EU’s efforts are beginning to take shape, with the spotlight falling on graphite. Kazakhstan’s Sarytogan deposit has been placed on the EU Commission’s list of “strategic projects” eligible for expedited permits and loan guarantees under the CRMA. Meanwhile, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development has taken a significant stake in the mine operator, marking a direct investment in the region’s CRM sector. The EU is now actively seeking downstream investors to refine indigenous graphite into anode-grade product, capturing added value that historically flowed to Chinese refiners.

    Lithium development is following a similar trajectory. A partnership between HMS Bergbau and Kazakhstan’s Creada Corporation aims to unlock the potential of Kazakh spodumene through extraction, processing, and refining into battery-ready lithium hydroxide. This would be a direct response to the EU’s new battery-passport regulations, which require materials of a certain purity.

    However, Europe faces a formidable competitor: China. The PRC Mineral Resources Law mandates environmental remediation planning before mining commences, setting a new baseline for responsible resource extraction. While welcomed, the application details remain vague, lacking guarantees on local community engagement and enforcement mechanisms, potentially creating loopholes for exploitation.

    Adding to the pressure, Chinese capital is expanding downstream. East Hope Group’s landmark $12 billion investment in Kazakh non-ferrous metals signifies a vertical integration approach—from mining and smelting to fabrication and renewable power generation. This $12 billion vertical integration project in Kazakhstan showcases China’s willingness to build a fully controllable supply chain.

    Europe must act strategically to counter these challenges.

    Firstly, financial aid should be contingent on stringent ESG benchmarks. EU financing must go hand-in-hand with clear, enforceable standards – ISO-compliant tailings dams, methane monitoring, gender-balanced workforce plans, and robust penalties for non-compliance.

    Secondly, the EU should focus on fostering value-adding industries beyond mining. This means investing in processing plants and recycling facilities, not just mines. By creating domestic processing hubs for cathode powders or rare-earth magnets, the CRMA’s 40 percent processing target can be achieved, generating jobs, technology transfer, and increased tax revenue for beneficiary countries.

    Finally, the EU must simplify visa requirements for Central Asian technical personnel. A targeted visa-facilitation agreement could allow them to train in Europe and return, strengthening the region’s skilled workforce.

    Securing a stable and sustainable supply of raw materials is a critical challenge for the EU. While China’s economic clout is undeniable, Europe has the opportunity to win this race by leveraging its commitment to ESG principles and building a truly sustainable, transparent, and trust-based partnership with Central Asia.

    Time is of the essence. The next 18 months, before China’s revised mining law takes full effect and East Hope’s megaproject begins construction, provide a crucial window for the EU to demonstrate its commitment to ESG beyond rhetoric. The stakes are high, as the fate of Europe’s essential raw materials supply hangs in the balance.

  • Daimler Truck Boosts Inventories to Shield Against Rare Earth Supply Risks from China

    Daimler Truck Boosts Inventories to Shield Against Rare Earth Supply Risks from China

    Faced with tightening export controls from China, German truckmaker Daimler Truck is ramping up inventories of key raw materials to protect against supply disruptions, CEO Karin Rådström said Tuesday at a press conference in Gothenburg.

    Citing lessons learned during the semiconductor crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic, Rådström explained that the company had already begun stockpiling critical components like chips to reduce reliance on just-in-time delivery systems — even though this approach requires tying up more capital.

    “With everything that’s going on in the world right now, this seems to be a good and necessary strategy,” she told reporters.

    A fresh concern is China’s new rare earth export licensing regime, implemented in April. The measures have slowed the flow of critical materials such as neodymium and dysprosium, used in vehicle motors, sensors, and electric power systems.

    China currently dominates the rare earths market, controlling the vast majority of global production and processing capacity. Automakers fear that bureaucratic delays or political tensions could choke supply lines vital for the green transition.

    While Daimler Truck has not yet experienced production halts, Rådström acknowledged the company is monitoring the situation closely. “So far, we seem to be getting what we need,” she said, adding that their purchasing department considers it a top priority.

  • Europe Sleepwalking into Critical Raw Materials Crisis, Warns Expert

    Europe Sleepwalking into Critical Raw Materials Crisis, Warns Expert

    29 January 20205, Brussels, Belgium — Peter Tom Jones, Director of the KU Leuven Institute for Sustainable Metals and Minerals (SIM2), issued a stark warning to European policymakers yesterday, declaring that failure to secure a self-sufficient critical raw materials (CRM) supply chain would leave Europe at the mercy of China. His remarks came during a high-stakes panel discussion in the European Parliament titled “Supporting the European Automotive Sector to Meet EU Green Transition Goals in Global Competition”, part of a broader event on supporting the EU automotive sector’s green transition.

    Europe’s “Abdication of Responsibility”

    Jones criticised Europe’s historic neglect of upstream mining and refining activities, accusing the bloc of outsourcing CRM production to the Global South while focusing solely on high-value downstream manufacturing. “This has been a significant abdication of our social and environmental responsibilities,” he said, arguing that reliance on external suppliers has left Europe exposed in an era of escalating geopolitical tensions.

    The panel, moderated by MEP Yvan Verougstraete and featuring industry leaders like Julia Poliscanova (Transport & Environment) and Sigrid de Vries (ACEA), highlighted the urgency of addressing supply chain vulnerabilities as the EU races to meet 2030 climate goals.

    China’s Vertical Dominance vs. Europe’s “Siloed Thinking”

    Jones underscored China’s dominance in building a vertically integrated “mine-to-EV” value chain, contrasting it with Europe’s fragmented approach. “While China plans strategically for the long term, Europe remains siloed and reactive,” he said, pointing to the recent shift by European automakers from nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) to lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) batteries. This pivot, he warned, has destabilized Europe’s nascent mining and refining sectors, which lack the infrastructure to support LFP production at scale.

    Compounding these challenges are China’s anticipated export restrictions on magnet and LFP battery technologies—a move Jones called “existential” for Europe’s green transition.

    Call to Action: 15 Mining, Refining, and Recycling Projects by 2030

    Jones urged rapid implementation of the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA), demanding immediate support for at least 15 strategic mining projects, 15 refining facilities, and 15 battery/magnet recycling plants. “With just five years until 2030, we cannot afford delays,” he stressed, warning that opposition from “ideologically driven anti-mining activists” threatens Europe’s energy transition.

    His proposal aligns with calls from industry groups like Eurometaux and Euromines, which have long advocated for streamlined permitting and funding for CRM projects.

    The Path Forward: “Evidence-Based Environmentalism”

    Jones concluded with a plea for pragmatism, advocating “evidence-based environmentalism” that balances ecological concerns with strategic needs. “We must engage companies, governments, and the public to develop an ESG-proof model for responsible metal production in Europe,” he said.

    The event, organised by the Renew Europe faction, signals growing political momentum to secure Europe’s raw materials future. Yet with China’s shadow looming large, the bloc faces a race against time to transform rhetoric into action.

    Key Stakeholders React

    • Judith Kirton-Darling (industriAll Europe): Emphasised the need for “just transition” policies to protect workers in traditional industries.
    • Julia Poliscanova: Warned against repeating fossil fuel-era mistakes by prioritising extraction over circular economy solutions.
    • PROMETIA & Horizon Europe consortia: Highlighted ongoing projects like LITHOS and EXCEED to innovate in sustainable mining and recycling.

    Peter Tom Jones’s full remarks and policy recommendations are available on his LinkedIn profile.