Tag: Fraser Institute

  • Kazakhstan’s Mining Policy Under Scrutiny

    Kazakhstan’s Mining Policy Under Scrutiny

    The shifting sands of Kazakhstan’s mining sector were the focus of a recent British-Kazakh Society (BKS) webinar, bringing together legal experts, industry professionals, and policymakers to dissect the impacts of evolving government regulations. Held on  13 November 2025, the discussion revealed a concerning trend of increasing investor uncertainty, despite the country’s rich geological potential.

    Land Barriers Continue to Hamper Investment


    Kazakhstan’s crucial mining sector is undergoing significant changes, grappling with persistent land access issues and the introduction of new tax policies. A presentation by Almat Daumov, Partner at GRATA International in Almaty, shed light on these challenges and proposed solutions, highlighting both potential hurdles and opportunities for investors.

    Despite seemingly swift issuance of exploration licenses for solid minerals (within 3-4 weeks), actual investment is frequently stalled by complex land-access barriers. Daumov emphasised that establishing servitude over private land for exploration can cause delays of 9-18 months. Even more critical, “akimats” (local executive bodies) are reportedly refusing compulsory land acquisition for mining projects deemed “non-state” in nature, citing budget limitations.

    Drawing on international experience, Daumov pointed to successful models in Australia, Canada, and Mexico, where simplified (notification-based) land-access procedures for exploration and government expropriation of land for public necessity (including mine development) are common.

    Proposed Solutions for Land Access:
    To address these issues, Daumov proposed key solutions:

    • Exploration: Akimats should establish public servitudes on both state and private land, as permitted by Article 69 of the Land Code.
    • Mining: Mine development should be consistently recognised as a public need (Article 84). He stressed the need for unified interpretation and practice by akimats. Furthermore, to alleviate the state budget burden, Article 87 should be amended to ensure compensation is paid directly to the subsoil user, not the state.

    New Tax Policies Introduce Volatility and Opportunity


    Beyond land access, Kazakhstan’s mining sector is also navigating significant tax policy changes.

    Higher Mineral Extraction Tax (MET) on Gold:
    Starting in 2026, a new progressive MET scale will apply to gold. This change is expected to introduce additional fiscal volatility and increase the risk premium for investors, particularly those involved in low-grade and high-cost operations.

    MET Reduction for Technogenic Mineral Ores (TMO):
    In a more positive development, the MET on solid minerals extracted from technogenic mineral formations will be reduced tenfold. This reform aims to make the re-processing of tailings and waste economically viable. The benefits are twofold: addressing environmental issues and bringing significant metal residues, long excluded from economic turnover, back into circulation.

    Introduction of Royalty Regime:
    Effective for exploration projects starting in 2027, Kazakhstan will introduce a Royalty regime in parallel with the MET. Current proposed royalty rates are 7% for metals and alloys, 10% for concentrates, and 13% for ores, raising concerns among industry stakeholders.

    Daumov’s analysis underscores a critical period for Kazakhstan’s mining sector. While the government aims to streamline processes and introduce new revenue streams, the effectiveness of these reforms will largely depend on clear implementation and a willingness to address investor concerns regarding both land access and fiscal predictability.

    Kazakhstan on the Investment Attractiveness Index


    Daniel A. Witt, President of the International Tax and Investment Center (ITIC), painted a picture of mixed signals for potential investors. While Kazakhstan has achieved its goal of being a top 50 most competitive country globally (ranking 34th in the 2025 IMD World Competitiveness Report), the micro-picture in the mining sector is less favourable.

    Witt cited the Fraser Institute Annual Survey of Mining Companies (2024), noting a significant drop in the country’s Policy Perception Index (PPI) score—the metric heavily influenced by government control over tax, legal, and regulatory parameters.

    “Kazakhstan came in 59 [on the Investment Attractiveness Index]. They fell… 59 is just barely passing,” stated Witt, stressing that the key challenge remains building a stable, predictable, and transparent fiscal and regulatory regime to attract large-scale international mining projects, similar to the success seen in the oil and gas sector. Specific concerns raised included the complexity of the tax system, difficulties obtaining VAT refunds, and the need for mechanisms to share risk between the state and investors.

    Policy Trends and Regulatory Erosion


    Timur Odilov, Founding Partner at Haller Lomax highlighted a worrying erosion of reforms designed to align Kazakhstan with international standards.

    Odilov noted that following the adoption of the Western Australian-based Mining Code in 2017, subsequent years have seen the re-emergence of stricter rules and instability, particularly since 2023. Key changes discussed included:

    • Erosion of CRISCO Standards: Discussions in parliament have begun challenging the transition to international reporting standards, favouring a return to Soviet-era standards.
    • Resource Nationalism: Increasing pressure for mandatory domestic discount sales and forced processing, even for materials that cannot be domestically processed (such as certain rare earths).
    • Uncertainty and Lack of Strategy: The policy shifts are driven by a mix of socio-political agendas and a perceived lack of “institutional memory” or a holistic strategic vision for the sector’s long-term development.

    Olga Petrova, Rio Tinto Exploration Kazakhstan Country Manager, affirmed this trend, stating that while the government continues to express interest in attracting investment, the actions—such as increasing land access costs for explorers—are “a little different,” appearing as a short-term win that ignores long-term losses.

    Investment Opportunities and Future Outlook


    Despite the challenges, the webinar underscored the vast potential of Kazakhstan’s mining sector. With abundant geology and a strategic location, Kazakhstan is well-positioned to become a global leader in critical minerals. However, to attract investment, the government must address policy risks, ensure property rights, and create a stable regulatory environment.

     

     

  • Finland Tops Global Mining Investment Rankings in 2025 Fraser Institute Survey

    Finland Tops Global Mining Investment Rankings in 2025 Fraser Institute Survey

    Finland has reclaimed its position as the most attractive global jurisdiction for mining investment, topping the Fraser Institute’s 2025 Annual Survey of Mining Companies. The Nordic country soared 16 places to claim first place, pushing Nevada to second and Alaska to third in the rankings.

    The report evaluates 82 jurisdictions based on both mineral potential and policy attractiveness. According to Elmira Aliakbari, co-author of the report and director at the Fraser Institute’s Centre for Natural Resource Studies, “The Fraser Institute’s mining survey is the most comprehensive report on not just a jurisdiction’s mineral potential, but also government policies that either attract or discourage mining investors.”

    The United States dominated the top ten with four states — Nevada, Alaska, Wyoming, and Arizona — while Europe had three entries and Canada followed with two. Saskatchewan maintained its strong performance, ranking seventh globally and leading Canada. Newfoundland and Labrador joined the top ten, buoyed by improved policy perception.

    However, not all Canadian jurisdictions fared well. British Columbia, despite its rich mineral base, continued to underperform due to regulatory uncertainty, land claims issues, and environmental policy challenges. Alberta, although ranked ninth globally on policy alone, did not make the top ten in overall investment attractiveness.

    Australia, another mining powerhouse, also failed to enter the top ten. Western Australia ranked seventeenth, with South Australia, the Northern Territory, and Queensland falling into the 30s.

    Botswana held its position as Africa’s most attractive mining destination but slipped from 15th to 20th overall due to investor concerns over regulatory duplication and legal uncertainty. The policy perception score for Botswana also declined significantly from the previous year.

    At the bottom of the list, Ethiopia was ranked as the least attractive jurisdiction, followed by Suriname and Niger. Nova Scotia represented Canada among the bottom ten, alongside countries such as Mozambique, Madagascar, Bolivia, and South Africa — which continues to slide down the rankings.

    Aliakbari stressed the importance of policy in attracting investment: “A sound, predictable regulatory regime coupled with competitive fiscal policies make a jurisdiction attractive to investors. Policymakers across the globe should understand that mineral deposits alone are not enough.”

    The Fraser Institute survey, a respected benchmark for mining investment sentiment, drew responses from executives and professionals across 82 jurisdictions worldwide.

  • Finland Tops Global Mining Rankings as Canada Falls Behind in Policy Attractiveness

    Finland Tops Global Mining Rankings as Canada Falls Behind in Policy Attractiveness

    Finland has reclaimed its position as the most attractive jurisdiction globally for mining and exploration, according to the latest Annual Survey of Mining Companies by the Fraser Institute. The Nordic nation, which led global rankings in the early 2010s, outperformed all other regions based on its mineral potential and mining-friendly policies.

    Finland was followed by the U.S. states of Nevada and Alaska, with Wyoming and Arizona rounding out the top five. Canada, once a consistent leader, saw a notable decline with only Saskatchewan (7th) and Newfoundland and Labrador (8th) remaining in the top 10. Saskatchewan dropped four places from the previous year, while Newfoundland and Labrador rose to eighth.

    The Fraser Institute’s survey, which assessed 82 jurisdictions through responses from approximately 350 mining professionals, considered both geological potential and policy factors including permitting efficiency, tax regimes, labour access, and environmental regulations. While 40% of respondents represented exploration firms, 32% were from mining companies.

    Canada’s fall in the rankings is attributed to growing policy uncertainty, particularly regarding land rights, environmental regulation, and overlapping governance. Quebec experienced the steepest drop, falling from 5th to 22nd, while Ontario slipped to 15th. The Yukon, British Columbia, and Manitoba scored poorly on policy despite strong geology, ranking 40th, 32nd, and 43rd respectively.

    Nova Scotia was among the worst performers overall. Sean Kirby, executive director of the Mining Association of Nova Scotia, said the province’s permitting system is hampering investment. “We need to fix permitting to attract investment and create jobs,” Kirby stated. He added that mining regulation is largely handled by officials outside the Department of Natural Resources, many of whom lack expertise in the sector.

    Globally, Ethiopia ranked lowest on the index, followed by Suriname, Niger, Nova Scotia, and Mozambique. In terms of policy only, Ireland led the rankings, while Bolivia came in last.

    Though the survey covered the period between August and December 2024, recent political changes in Canada — including Mark Carney’s election as prime minister and new legislation to fast-track major projects — could potentially improve the country’s position in future surveys.