Tag: RWE

  • Dutch government to pay RWE $355 mln for not using coal

    Dutch government to pay RWE $355 mln for not using coal

    The esteemed Dutch government, in a display of fiscal responsibility and environmental consciousness, announced on Monday its intention to remunerate Germany’s RWE with a sum of 331.8 million euros ($355 million) as compensation for the loss of income incurred due to the imposition of a production cap on coal companies during the 2022-2024 timeframe. The primary objective behind this cap was to effectively curtail national carbon dioxide emissions, thus fostering a greener future.

    In a letter addressed to parliament, the honorable Energy Minister Rob Jetten expounded upon the compensation, revealing that it would be somewhat lesser than the initial demand of 1.9 billion euros put forth by the three companies involved in operating coal plants within the Netherlands: RWE, Uniper, and the privately held Onyx. This reduction in compensation is rooted in the abrupt removal of the production cap in mid-2022, a consequential decision prompted by the imperative to reduce reliance on scarce gas resources in the aftermath of Russia’s incursion into Ukraine.

    While the compensation for the remaining two companies is yet to be determined, it is worth noting that the Netherlands has prudently set aside a total of 730 million euros to address such financial obligations, as articulated by Minister Jetten.

    It is worth highlighting that, in accordance with Dutch legislation, these plants will be compelled to cease operations no later than 2030. In a ruling delivered in November of the previous year, a court judiciously dismissed the claims put forth by these companies for additional compensation pertaining to the aforementioned closure. It is evident, therefore, that the Dutch government remains steadfast in its commitment to advancing an environmentally conscious agenda.

  • RWE tears down operational wind turbines in grab for more coal

    RWE tears down operational wind turbines in grab for more coal

    The demolitions are part of a deal brokered with Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck and Economics Minister for North Rhine Westphalia, Mona Neubaur, that is supposed to see RWE wind down its coal operations by 2030. RWE is Europe’s second largest CO2 emitter from coal power stations, and has razed over 100 villages in the Rhineland region to make way for its coal operations. Germany’s government is still aiming to exit coal by 2030.

    “The current climate emergency requires urgent and concerted efforts to accelerate the deployment of every single wind turbine, solar panel and heat pump that we can muster. Anything that diverts from this critical endeavour, especially the dismantling of renewable energy sources to extract more fossil fuels, must be unequivocally prohibited,” said Fabian Hübner, senior campaigner in Germany at Beyond Fossil Fuels.

  • Germany: Ukrainian refugees living in mining ‘ghost towns’

    Germany: Ukrainian refugees living in mining ‘ghost towns’

    If you open Google Maps to look at the western German state of North Rhine-Westphalia, you’ll notice three large pale patches. They represent three colossal open-pit mines — Inden, Hambach and Garzweiler — where the energy company RWE is extracting brown coal (lignite) from the earth.

    Right next door are towns and villages that have stood abandoned for months or, in some cases, years. These “ghost towns” were originally set to be demolished to make way for more mining, but with the German government’s decision to phase out coal, their future is now unclear.

    Near the Hambach surface mine, which opened in 1978 and is set to close by 2030, are the two “ghost villages” of Morschenich and Manheim, supposedly fated for demolition to make way for mining.

    A lignite coal mine in Hambach
    RWE extracts lignite coal at the Hambach mineImage: Daniela Natalie Posdnjakov/DW

    Arriving in Manheim, you see rows of houses with their shutters rolled down and their windows boarded up. The asphalt road is torn up and the street lights are broken. In the center of the village stands a Catholic church, which also has its windows nailed up. Some of the houses still in good condition are surrounded by barbed wire. A sign declares who their owner is: RWE.

    ‘We’re not complaining whatsoever’

    You don’t meet many people here. Technically, there be shouldn’t any at all, as is also the case in neighboring Morschenich. Here too, rows and rows of houses stand empty, their windows sealed off and the grass out front growing tall. At first glance, you might mistake it for another “ghost village.”

    But if you look closely, you’ll see that some of the houses in Morschenich have white paper labels tacked onto their doors. On one is a Ukrainian name, another an Arabic one. In one of these lives a Ukrainian couple, Denis and Julia, whose names have been changed to protect their identity.

    They have been in Morschenich since December 2022, they told DW. The once single-occupancy house is now home to several people — a Ukrainian family from Donbas and refugees from Syria, a sort of a small refugee shelter.

    “We’re not complaining whatsoever. We have electricity, water, heating, even Wi-Fi and mobile internet,” Denis says. “We can call home to Ukraine. People working for local authorities come every week and help us with paperwork. We get social welfare benefits regularly. The only thing we haven’t had yet is language courses.”

    The fact that the town lacks shops and has no drugstore or doctor doesn’t bother them. Julia drives to the neighboring village to get groceries, she explains. Next to the house is a car with Ukrainian license plates.

    A church spire can be seen in the background, with a wall with a mural in front, then overgrown grass.
    The grass grows long near a church in MorschenichImage: Daniela Natalie Posdnjakov/DW

    “When we first got here, nothing was clear to us. Later, someone explained to us what kind of place it is. But back home in Ukraine, we had been under fire for three months, and here it is peaceful,” they say.

    They point out to the woods beginning just on the other side of a field. “Climate activists live there,” Denis says. “They’ve built houses in the trees. Sometimes we see them, but they don’t bother us.” The police come regularly to check that everything is okay, he adds.

    There are several Ukrainian families living in Morschenich these days. Denis and Julia see them when local authorities come by or when they go out for a walk. “It looks boring here at first glance, but we go berry picking,” Julia says.

    “Sometimes we go into town, but it’s so loud there that we are happy when we get back to the country,” Denis adds.

    The couple say they don’t know how long they will stay in this place. “Apparently they won’t demolish this village. The municipality sent us here, but first we were in a refugee camp in [nearby city] Bochum, so we will stay here until they resettle us,” Julia says.

    Morschenich is indeed to be spared destruction, according to the latest plans. Germany has pledged to phase out coal-fired power stations altogether by 2038 as part of its bid to curb carbon emissions.

    A bus stop with trees in the background
    This bus stop in Morschenich is still servicedImage: Daniela Natalie Posdnjakov/DW

    RWE confirmed the plan to DW. “The places mentioned are no longer set to be razed,” the spokesperson said. “We made the houses and flats in question, which we had previously bought from families being resettled, available to people in urgent need of a roof over their heads at the request of local authorities.”

    Once a school, now a refugee shelter

    Not far away, located near another surface mine called Garzweiler II, are the villages of Kuckum and Keyenberg. Residents here were also bought out of their homes and relocated. Soon, the two towns are set to disappear.

    Next door is Lützerath, a village that became famous earlier this year due to a wave of climate protests that saw Swedish youth activist Greta Thunberg pay a visit. It too is set to be razed this year, and all the roads leading there are closed.

    But Keyenberg can still be reached by car. At first glance, it looks just like the other abandoned villages: The same narrow streets with rows of well-built but empty houses surrounding a Catholic church.

    A few meters further down the road is the school building, from which several people suddenly emerge. They carry chairs out with them and put them in the schoolyard. It’s a hot day.

    “We live here. We come from Syria,” one man says before quickly disappearing. Whether they really reside there is unclear. Nobody is willing to talk, everybody retreats back into the building.

    An overgrown playground
    A playground in Keyenberg with few signs of recent visitorsImage: Daniela Natalie Posdnjakov/DW

    Next to the school there is a bus stop with a timetable. Keyenberg is still served by public transport. On the door of a bakery opposite the church, the opening hours are displayed — just a few hours on some days of the week. There are no longer any real stores or pharmacies here and almost all the shops are empty. But the presence of several parked cars suggests that some houses are inhabited.

    “There are still residents in Keyenberg, but about 80% have moved away after receiving compensation. About 15-20% are still there,” Irina Becker, a local councilor in the nearby city of Bochum of the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), told DW.

    “Refugees are also currently living here,” added Becker, who sits on Bochum council’s integration committee. “The old school has been set up for them. Several houses also serve as accommodation. Some are used individually, others in the form of shared accommodation.

    “There is electricity, water and heating. Language and integration courses have been organized for the refugees living here and the children go to preschool,” she says.

    Who is sending refugees to abandoned villages?

    There is also a Ukrainian family with a child in Keyenberg. They decline to give their names, but explain that they were “in Poland for a long time.” On social media, they learned that you could go to Bochum and be assigned to a major city like Düsseldorf or Cologne. But in the end, they say state authorities sent them first to the smaller town of Erkelenz, and then to Keyenberg.

    Refugees are automatically distributed among Germany’s 16 states and thousands of municipalities according to certain quotas, and homes are assigned according to need.

    A building with the shutters rolled down
    In Keyenberg, Ukrainian refugees say they will stay if they canImage: Daniela Natalie Posdnjakov/DW

    The state government of North Rhine-Westphalia had not yet responded to DW’s questions about placing refugees in empty villages by the time this piece was published, and local authorities in the municipalities of Erkelenz and Merzenich were not reachable for comment.

    The Ukrainian refugee family in Keyenberg say they like the village. For the moment, they are alone in the house, but another family from Ukraine is expected to join them soon. They admit that they were initially alarmed. “But it’s better here than lying on a cot in a gymnasium somewhere,” they say, thinking of their acquaintances who still live like that.

    As long as there is war in Ukraine, they do not want to return. They might stay in Germany even after the war ends. “Let’s see, at the moment everything is fine,” the Ukrainians say. “The village will not be demolished. Maybe we will stay here if we are allowed.”

    This article was originally published in German.

  • German coal plants follow steps of large miners to clean image

    German coal plants follow steps of large miners to clean image

    [vc_section][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/6″][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_empty_space][vc_column_text]

    Germany’s coal companies are following large multinational miners in cleaning up their image, with critics concerned that restructuring plans may set the stage for emissions to rise further.

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_empty_space][vc_separator][vc_empty_space height=”10px”][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”2/3″][widget-SocialWidget][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][link url=”https://www.miningweekly.com/article/german-coal-plants-follow-steps-of-large-miners-to-clean-image-2023-07-14″ content_text=”News source”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_empty_space][vc_column_text]The owner of the country’s second largest coal miner said last week that it will split off its dirty operations from renewables, becoming the latest among several companies to do so. That’s similar to moves by fossil-heavy corporations including Teck Resources and Anglo American, both of which have made efforts to restructure their businesses to get coal assets off their books, rather than shutting them down altogether.

    A key risk is that owners of dirty spun-off assets will continue to run them with less pressure from shareholders to go green. While coal plants were considered critical for ensuring Germany’s energy security during last year’s crisis, companies seeking more favorable financing options are trying to get such assets off their books.

    “The pressure from the financial sector — banks, investors, insurance companies — on operators of coal-fired power plants to divest from their ‘dirty’ business is increasing worldwide,” said Hanns Koenig, Managing Director Central Europe for Aurora Energy Research. “Emissions can of course also rise after such a transaction if the new owners continue to operate power plants.”

    While the idea of spinning off dirty businesses has been underway for a while among large multinationals — with Anglo American completing the demerger of its South African coal business in 2021 — it has only recently gained momentum among German coal operators.

    Czech energy company EPH – which is led by billionaire Daniel Kretinsky — announced last week that it will transfer its German lignite operations into a new sister company, EP Energy Transition. “As a result, EPH will be almost free from all of its current coal assets by 2025 and will completely abandon coal as a power generation source by 2030,” it stated. While the new firm should also invest €10-billion into renewables, the coal plants under the new company are expected to run until 2035-2038, according to the group’s sustainability report.

    Last year, the country’s largest coal operator RWE came under pressure from an activist investor to separate the German utility’s lignite unit from its clean-energy operations, but the proposal was voted down by other shareholders. In October RWE committed to end coal in 2030 — eight years earlier than previously planned — and has since floated plans to spin off its lignite operations into a state-run foundation.

    In contrast to the situation for larger global players, the push in Germany is also coming from small shareholders and municipalities rather than big investment or pension funds. STEAG — a hard-coal burning company largely owned by communal utilities — has worked on the separation of its green operations since last year, and announced the creation of its new renewables subsidiary Iqony this January, while coal assets will continue as STEAG Power GmbH.

    The advantage for the green business is that it gets “more visibility, bank financing and makes it much easier to place our services with customers,” according to Iqony Head of Communications Christoph Dollhausen.

    The possible consequences for emissions might be exemplified by a similar event in 2016, when Swedish energy company Vattenfall AB sold its lignite operations in eastern Germany. The utility said the transaction wiped out 57 million tons of annual CO2 emissions from its portfolio. But the emissions did not vanish: EPH bought up the assets, and restarted the already mothballed coal plants during last year’s energy crisis.

    EPH insists on burning coal until 2038 — whereas Vattenfall had announced plans to cut 55% of its emissions by 2030.

    “If Vattenfall were still the operator in Germany now, it would never have been able to justify such a long coal operation, and would probably have shut down the plants sooner,” said Sebastian Röttersenergy campaigner of Urgewald, a non-profit environmental organization.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][epic_post_tag compatible_column_notice=”” font_size=”17px”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/6″][vc_text_separator title=”LATEST NEWS” color=”juicy_pink”][vc_empty_space height=”10px”][widget-LatestPosts post_number=”4″][vc_empty_space height=”10px”][vc_text_separator title=”MOST POPULAR” color=”juicy_pink”][vc_empty_space height=”10px”][widget-popular-posts post_count=”4″][vc_empty_space][vc_wp_search title=”Search”][vc_empty_space][lvs display_like=””][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/6″][/vc_column][/vc_row][/vc_section][vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][distance desktop_type=”50″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][epic_block_28 compatible_column_notice=”” number_post=”6″ post_offset=”0″ first_title=”You may also like”][/epic_block_28][vc_empty_space][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][epic_hero_5 compatible_column_notice=”” hero_margin=”0″ content_filter_number_alert=”” post_offset=”0″][/vc_column][/vc_row][/vc_section]