Tag: mining waste

  • Geologist Calls for Market-Based Approach to Processing Kazakhstan’s Technogenic Mineral Waste

    Geologist Calls for Market-Based Approach to Processing Kazakhstan’s Technogenic Mineral Waste

    Kazakhstan has accumulated vast volumes of technogenic mineral formations (TMF) over decades of mining and metallurgical operations, raising renewed debate over how to effectively utilise these surface stockpiles containing valuable metals.

    In an interview, experienced geologist Bolat Kabaziev described TMF as industrial waste generated by mines, processing plants and metallurgical facilities that still contain recoverable metals. Despite increasing public discussion in recent years, he noted that relatively few large-scale projects have been implemented, as metal recovery from waste requires complex and often innovative technologies.

    Currently, both conventional methods such as gravity separation and flotation, as well as hydrometallurgical techniques including leaching, are used to extract metals from TMF. Kabaziev emphasised that while processing such waste can mitigate environmental risks posed by tailings and dumps, proper reclamation and monitoring remain essential.

    He expressed concern over the earlier transfer of Soviet-era TMF into private ownership, arguing that the move was premature and did not accelerate environmental remediation or reprocessing. In his view, placing TMF into an open and competitive market would have encouraged smaller private companies to begin processing operations more actively.

    Access to TMF located on operating mining sites has also become a challenge, particularly after the adoption of the 2018 Subsoil Code. According to Kabaziev, conflicts over ownership and balance separation have slowed reuse efforts.

    Beyond surface waste, he highlighted the potential of recovering metals from previously mined deposits where unextracted reserves remain underground. Advances in technology could make such resources economically viable, particularly amid rising gold and copper prices.

    While tax reductions on TMF have been introduced, Kabaziev believes more systematic action is needed. He proposes establishing a scientific and industrial centre to conduct nationwide monitoring of TMF and reassess regulatory approaches. Determining metal content, he noted, is technically feasible through standard exploration methodologies.

    Kabaziev concluded that reintroducing TMF into active economic circulation could attract new investors without undermining geological exploration efforts. Given declining mineral reserves and slow replenishment, he considers TMF a strategically important resource capable of sustaining metal production for decades if managed responsibly.

  • Ukraine Eyes Mining Waste as Strategic Source of Critical Materials

    Ukraine Eyes Mining Waste as Strategic Source of Critical Materials

    Ukraine plans to broaden its investment strategy for critical raw materials under the American-Ukrainian Reconstruction Investment Fund (AUIF), considering not only greenfield deposits but also alternative sources such as mining waste and tailings, Deputy Minister of Economy, Environment and Agriculture Yehor Perelyhin has said.

    In a column for Interfax-Ukraine, Perelyhin described decades-old mining and metallurgical waste as a potential “new raw material base” capable of supplying metals essential for batteries, electronics, aviation, and defense — while also addressing environmental damage from legacy industrial activity.

    He outlined six priority areas for exploration. The first involves tailings dams from mineral sands (titanium and monazite), where rutile, ilmenite, and zircon remain. Advanced processing and hydrometallurgy could unlock zirconium, hafnium, and scandium — vital for ceramics, optics, and aerospace.

    A second area is “red sludge” and slags from titanium dioxide pigment and alumina plants, which contain scandium alongside titanium, iron, and aluminum. Perelyhin noted that existing technologies allow scandium extraction modules to be integrated directly into production lines, reducing costs and accelerating output.

    Other promising sources include:

    • Phosphogypsum and phosphate waste, where rare earth recovery can be paired with gypsum production for construction.

    • Thermal power plant ash and coal dumps, which hold rare earths, gallium, scandium, aluminum, and germanium.

    • Tailings of iron, copper, and nickel ores, where cobalt, tellurium, germanium, vanadium, tungsten, and even gold and silver may be recovered with modern leaching methods.

    • Waste from uranium mining and processing, which contains vanadium, scandium, molybdenum, selenium, heavy rare earth elements, and yttrium, representing both strategic value and urgent environmental remediation needs.

    Perelyhin emphasized that this “brownfield” approach offers quicker access to marketable materials with lower capital investment than new mines, aligning with both Ukraine’s industrial strategy and global demand for critical minerals.

  • Kazakhstan Eyes Industrial Revolution Through Waste Mineral Reprocessing

    Kazakhstan Eyes Industrial Revolution Through Waste Mineral Reprocessing

    Kazakhstan is sitting on more than 55 billion tonnes of technogenic mineral formations (TMFs) — the result of decades of intensive mining and mineral processing. But while this massive reserve of industrial waste is growing by 300–700 million tonnes annually, only 11% is currently being recycled, far behind the 70–80% reprocessing rate in developed countries.

    TMFs — tailings, slags, ashes, and waste rock — often contain valuable residual metals such as copper, zinc, and rare earth elements. As traditional ore reserves diminish, these “wastes” present a significant opportunity to recover critical resources and reduce environmental harm.

    President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev has highlighted the importance of moving from accumulation to utilization of TMFs. Reprocessing could not only ease ecological pressure, but also fuel industrialization, support single-industry towns, create jobs, and help diversify the national economy.

    Experts warn, however, that current legislation lacks clarity. TMFs are simultaneously classified as both waste and subsoil resources, meaning they are taxed like raw mineral output but lack a clear legal framework for extraction and reuse. Calls are growing for reforms to reclassify certain TMFs as secondary resources under Kazakhstan’s Environmental Code.

    The Ministry of Industry and Construction has begun an inventory of TMFs and is working on a roadmap to support rare and rare earth metal sectors. Officials are considering simplified licenses for TMF processing and legal changes to allow removal of TMFs from residential areas.

    At the same time, industrial players are already investing in practical solutions. Qarmet is advancing 10 reprocessing projects worth over $137 million, while ERG Recycling processes over 1 million tonnes of TMFs annually, developing new materials for construction and metallurgy.

    Experts emphasize that unlocking the full potential of TMFs requires tax incentives, green investment, and robust science-business-government coordination. Kazakhstan’s new Tax Code includes a reduced mineral extraction tax rate (0.1 coefficient) for materials recovered from TMFs, signaling progress.

    Ultimately, stakeholders agree that TMF reprocessing must become core industrial policy. “It’s not just a technological issue — it’s a matter of national importance,” said Gulnara Bizhanova of Atameken. With soaring global demand for metals and a drive toward green energy, Kazakhstan could evolve from a raw material exporter into a producer of high-tech, value-added goods.

  • Environmental Concerns Over Armenia’s Rivers Highlighted by Experts

    Environmental Concerns Over Armenia’s Rivers Highlighted by Experts

    Armenia’s rivers face severe ecological challenges due to the impacts of mining and small hydropower plants, experts revealed on International River Day. Bardukh Gabrielyan, director of the Zoology and Hydroecology Research Center, criticized the industry for polluting rivers and damaging ecosystems, even when standards are met.

    Victoria Buniazyan, editor of EcoLur, highlighted findings from a study of 130 hydroelectric power stations, pointing out declining fish stocks and river imbalances caused by these plants. Additionally, 15 rivers were found heavily polluted by mining waste in a 2017 assessment.

    Long-term forecasts suggest further decline in river watercourses, with expected reductions of 11.9% by 2030 and 34% by 2050. These alarming trends underscore the urgent need for stricter environmental policies and sustainable management practices to protect Armenia’s aquatic ecosystems.

  • Europe’s Mining Waste Regulations Found Lacking, Says NGO Report

    Europe’s Mining Waste Regulations Found Lacking, Says NGO Report

    Despite Europe’s reputation for high environmental and social standards, its regulations on mining waste are outdated and insufficient, according to a legal analysis commissioned by the European NGO Transport & Environment (T&E). As Europe plans to ramp up mining activities to meet the 10% benchmark set by the Critical Raw Materials Act, the NGO assessed the adequacy of current regulations. The analysis, conducted by Netherlands-based law firm Hörchner Advocaten, revealed significant shortcomings in the 2006 EU Extractive Waste Directive (EWD). The report highlights issues such as the lack of mandated safest mining waste technologies, inadequate protection for the environment and communities, unclear responsibilities in case of accidents, and uncertain timelines for mine closures. T&E warns that these gaps could lead to inconsistent application of the directive across member states, increasing the risk of environmental and social harm. The NGO is now calling for an urgent revision of the EWD to address these concerns.

  • In Kazakhstan, there is a proposal to allow the development of mining waste within populated areas.

    In Kazakhstan, there is a proposal to allow the development of mining waste within populated areas.

    The proposal to allow the extraction of technogenic mineral formations (TMF) located within populated areas and within 1 km of them is stated in an advisory document on regulatory policy for the draft law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On Amendments and Additions to Some Legislative Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Subsoil Use to Improve the Investment Climate.”

    In Kazakhstan, there is a proposal to allow the development of mining waste within populated areas.”The prohibition established by Article 25 (Subsoil Code, which prohibits subsoil use operations on lands within populated areas and within 1 km of them – italicized) prevents obtaining subsoil use rights for TMF located in populated areas. At the same time, underground extraction of TMF is not possible as the objects are located on the surface of the land. In turn, granting the right to extract solid minerals (TPM) from TMF within populated areas will free up land, improve the environmental situation (through the removal of ore or tailings), and create jobs,” the published document states.

    Developers note that a significant portion of TMF resulting from mining activities is currently located within populated areas or within a 1 km protective zone: terricones in the East Kazakhstan region, Balhash, Kentau tailing ponds, and so on. According to established practice, subsoil users have had to buy land and houses from local residents, compensating for their relocation to other populated areas. Now, this practice is effectively being proposed to be discontinued.

    However, developers believe that the extraction of minerals from such TMF should be aimed at exporting the TPM from the extraction site without processing them on-site, as such activities would exacerbate the environmental situation. Therefore, the document emphasizes that when signing agreements to support the local population and coordinating environmental impact assessments (EIA), requirements for preserving the environmental situation will take precedence.

    In addition, the document proposes to ease the conditions for artisanal miners. According to the code, applicants for an artisanal miner’s license must own a cargo truck with a capacity of no more than 10 tons, drilling equipment, as well as an excavator or bulldozer with a total bucket volume of no more than half a cubic meter. However, for artisanal miners, acquiring an excavator and bulldozer for stripping and reclamation work is costly and impractical expenditure, so the use of equipment on a rental basis is proposed to solve this problem.

    The developers also suggest regulating, following the example of foreign legislation, the amounts to be paid by subsoil users for using land plots for geological exploration within the framework of private or public servitude (limited right to use someone else’s land). When establishing private servitude, a fee for servitude and compensation for damages are provided. However, because the parties cannot reach an agreement on this matter, the subsoil user cannot start geological exploration. The document notes that the absence of regulation on the amount often leads to unjustified overestimation of expectations regarding the amounts from landowners’ side.