Website: Europe.com

  • Carmakers Revolutionize Mining Industry Due to Lithium Scarcity

    Carmakers Revolutionize Mining Industry Due to Lithium Scarcity

    [vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][distance desktop_type=”30″][lvs][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_btn title=”Source – Walls Sreet Rebel” color=”sky” i_type=”material” i_icon_material=”vc-material vc-material-perm_device_information” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fwallstreetrebel.com%2Fwsr%2Farticles%2Fcarmakers_revolutionize_mining_industry_due_to_lithium_scarcity%2F2023-07-03-09-17-01.html|target:_blank”][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_column_text]

    Ford and General Motors have partnered with mining businesses to avoid raw material shortages that might hinder their electric vehicle (EV) ambitions. This proactive strategy shows the industry’s awareness of the need for a stable raw material supply chain.

    To avoid falling behind Tesla and Chinese automakers, some executives from Western automobile manufacturers intentionally avoid traditional suppliers in favor of striking arrangements with firms that mine lithium. These transactions include large financial commitments on the part of Western executives.

    Mining businesses are taking a more proactive approach to securing essential resources as they transition from using gasoline to using battery power. This trend is expected to continue. These firms are sending out teams to evaluate mines in different regions, such as Chile, Argentina, Quebec, and Nevada, with an eye on the future. The crews are outfitted with protective gear such as hard helmets and boots with steel toes. Their major purpose is to ensure a consistent supply of critical metal that can either make or destroy their businesses in this transforming period. If they are unsuccessful in this endeavor, they will have failed in their fundamental objective.

    The absence of lithium poses a significant challenge for car manufacturers in the United States and Europe, as it hinders their ability to produce batteries required for electric pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles, and sedans. This dearth of lithium threatens its competitiveness in the market. The imminent cessation of assembly lines in key locations such as Michigan, Tennessee, and Saxony, Germany, is a matter of concern.

    In light of the surging demand for electric vehicles, it has become increasingly evident that established mining companies are grappling with a shortage of lithium, a crucial resource for the industry. As the global shift towards sustainable transportation gains momentum, the existing lithium supply falls short of meeting the burgeoning needs of the electric vehicle sector.

    This predicament poses a significant challenge for mining companies, who must now confront insufficient lithium reserves. In a bold and visionary move, General Motors (GM) has unveiled its ambitious plan to transition its entire fleet of vehicles to electric power by 2035. This announcement marks a significant milestone in the automotive industry as one of the world’s largest automakers sets its sights on a future that is both sustainable and environmentally conscious. GM’s commitment to an all-electric future is a testament to the company’s unwavering dedication to reducing greenhouse According to a recent report by Kelley Blue Book, the sales of battery-powered cars, pickups, and sport utility vehicles (SUVs) in the United States witnessed a significant surge of 45 percent in the first quarter of 2023 compared to the same period last year. This data highlights the growing popularity and consumer demand for electric vehicles (EVs) in the American automotive market.

    In the fiercely competitive automotive industry, car manufacturers compete to secure exclusive rights to smaller mines, aiming to gain a strategic advantage over their rivals. The urgency to secure these mining resources stems from the fear of potential competitors swooping in and seizing the opportunity for themselves. However, this particular strategy exposes these entities to the inherent risks associated with the volatile nature of the mining industry. Moreover, these risks are often amplified when operations are conducted in politically unstable regions that lack robust environmental safeguards. In automotive manufacturing, a potentially precarious situation looms for automakers who may find themselves paying exorbitant prices for lithium should their bets on this critical resource be misguided. The consequences of such miscalculations could result in automakers shelling out significantly more for lithium than its market value in the coming years.

    In a recent development, automotive industry leaders have come forward to shed light on the compelling reasons behind their decision-making process. According to these executives, the lack of adequate and dependable supplies of essential battery materials, such as lithium, nickel, and cobalt, has left them with no alternative but to make difficult choices. This scarcity of resources has emerged as a significant hurdle in meeting the global demand for electric vehicles, which continues to grow exponentially.

    In previous times, automotive manufacturers had delegated the responsibility of procuring lithium and other essential raw materials to their battery suppliers. The automotive industry, faced with a scarcity of lithium, has been compelled to take matters into its own hands. In response to the limited availability of this crucial metal, car manufacturers, who possess substantial financial resources, have resorted to procuring lithium directly and arranging for its delivery to battery production facilities. These facilities are either owned by suppliers or partially or wholly owned by the automakers. The efficient conduction of energy in batteries is made possible by utilizing lightweight lithium ions.

    In a strategic move, the automaker successfully established a supply agreement with Livent, a prominent lithium company based in Philadelphia, during the previous year. This agreement ensures a steady and reliable source of material derived from South American mines, further solidifying the automaker’s position in the market. In a significant move, General Motors decided in January to allocate a substantial investment of $650 million towards Lithium Americas, a prominent Vancouver-based company. This investment aims to facilitate the development of the Thacker Pass mine located in Nevada. This decision showcases General Motors’s commitment to securing a reliable supply of lithium, a crucial component for the production of electric vehicles. In a highly competitive bidding process, the company emerged victorious among a pool of 50 contenders, which included prominent battery and component manufacturers. This significant achievement was confirmed by Mr. Kunjur and executives from Lithium Americas, underscoring the company’s strategic prowess and ability to secure a valuable stake.

    Ford Motor, the automotive giant, has recently forged significant lithium deals with three prominent companies: SQM, a leading supplier hailing from Chile; Albemarle, headquartered in Charlotte, N.C.; and Nemaska Lithium, a prominent player in the lithium industry based in Quebec. These strategic partnerships are poised to impact Ford’s future endeavors profoundly.

    In a compelling statement made to investors in May, Lisa Drake, the Vice President for Electric Vehicle Industrialization at Ford, highlighted a select group of prominent lithium producers renowned for their exceptional quality and substantial global presence.

    In a reminiscent nod to the early days of the automotive industry, automakers are currently forging agreements with mining companies and raw material processors. This strategic move resembles Ford’s pioneering venture in Brazil, where the company established rubber plantations to ensure a steady supply of materials for tire production.

    In a thought-provoking statement, Mr. Kunjur highlights the striking resemblance between the current and a bygone era nearly a century ago. This observation suggests we may have come full circle as a new revolution unfolds.

    The establishment of a robust supply chain for lithium is projected to incur significant costs, amounting to a staggering $51 billion, as reported by Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, a reputable consulting firm in the industry. To avail themselves of the subsidies provided by the United States, battery raw materials must be extracted and processed within North America or by nations that share a trade alliance with the U.S.

    According to several executives, the exorbitant prices of lithium have reached unsustainable levels due to fierce competition in the market.

    In a recent statement, R.J. Scaringe, the chief executive of Rivian, an electric vehicle company based in Irvine, California, highlighted the rapid surge in lithium prices since the beginning of 2022. This unprecedented price escalation, coupled with the prevailing hype surrounding the industry, has led to the emergence of numerous unfavorable deals in the market. Scaringe’s remarks shed light on the challenges industry players face amidst this dynamic landscape.

    Many enterprises are currently engaged in the development of mines, fostering a promising landscape for lithium production. As this trend continues to unfold, it is plausible to anticipate a future wherein the supply of lithium surpasses the collective demand, thus ensuring ample availability to cater to all stakeholders’ needs. The potential for a rapid upswing in global production has emerged as a significant factor that could precipitate an earlier-than-anticipated surge. This, in turn, may result in a substantial decline in the price of lithium, a phenomenon observed in the not-too-distant past. The potential consequence of such a scenario would result in automakers incurring significantly higher costs for the metal, surpassing its intrinsic value.

    In a climate of heightened caution, automotive industry leaders display a palpable sense of apprehension. Their concerns stem from the realization that any prolonged shortage of lithium, a crucial resource for electric vehicle batteries, could potentially impede their companies’ ability to remain competitive in the long run. This prevailing sentiment underscores the industry’s recognition of the urgent need to secure a stable and sustainable lithium supply to avoid falling behind in the rapidly evolving EV market.

    The concerns expressed by individuals are indeed valid and deserving of attention. In regions where the sales of electric vehicles have experienced rapid growth, traditional automakers have encountered significant setbacks. In the rapidly evolving landscape of China’s automotive industry, the dominance of electric vehicles is undeniable. With nearly a third of new cars being electric, global giants such as Volkswagen, General Motors, and Ford have experienced a decline in their market share.

    Through years of dedicated effort, Tesla, a renowned electric vehicle manufacturer, has successfully established a robust supply chain for essential resources like lithium and other raw materials. As a result, the company has been consistently expanding its market presence in China, Europe, and the United States. In a remarkable achievement, the automotive brand has secured its position as the second-largest seller of new vehicles in the highly competitive California market, trailing only behind the industry giant Toyota. This noteworthy milestone underscores the brand’s growing prominence and regional market share.

    Chinese companies possess a distinct advantage over their American and European counterparts in the automotive industry. This advantage stems from their status as either state-owned or state-supported entities, which allows them to undertake more daring ventures in the mining realm. These mining endeavors frequently encounter obstacles such as local opposition, nationalization by populist governments, or technical challenges.

    In a significant development, the renowned Chinese battery manufacturer Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited (CATL) recently finalized a momentous agreement with Bolivia. The agreement entails a substantial investment of $1.4 billion in two lithium projects, marking a noteworthy milestone in the global lithium industry. The country, renowned for its political instability, has failed to attract long-term commitment from Western corporations.

    In a strategic move, Western car manufacturers have largely refrained from acquiring ownership stakes in lithium mines, with only a handful of exceptions. In a strategic shift, companies are now engaging in negotiations to establish agreements that entail a commitment to procure a specified quantity of lithium within a predetermined price bracket.

    In many instances, the agreements granted to car manufacturers give them advantageous privileges, creating a competitive disadvantage for other industry players. In a significant development, electric vehicle giant Tesla has recently struck a strategic agreement with Piedmont Lithium, a mining company located in close proximity to Charlotte. This landmark deal secures a substantial share of the output from a prominent mine in Quebec for the renowned car manufacturer.

    Lithium, a highly sought-after resource, is known for its abundance; however, its extraction process is often fraught with challenges.

    Several nations, including Bolivia, Chile, and Argentina, have adopted policies that involve nationalizing their abundant natural resources or implementing strict currency exchange controls. These measures can potentially restrict foreign investor’s ability to withdraw funds from these countries. Establishing mines in both Canada and the United States is a time-consuming process that can span several years.

    In a recent statement, Eric Norris, the president of Albemarle’s Lithium global business unit, shed light on the challenges that lie ahead in the pursuit of widespread electrification and the acquisition of lithium within the United States. As the foremost American lithium miner, Albemarle holds a unique perspective. Norris emphasized the formidable nature of obtaining lithium, highlighting the hurdles that must be overcome to achieve full electrification in the country.

    In light of recent developments, automotive industry executives and consultants are increasingly embarking on global expeditions to various mining sites. It is worth noting that a significant portion of these mines are still in the preliminary stages of production.

    According to Amanda Hall, the chief executive of Summit Nanotech, a pioneering Canadian start-up specializing in the acceleration of lithium extraction from saline groundwater, a sense of urgency is palpable. In an effort to proactively address the issue at hand, automotive industry leaders have been diligently working towards finding viable solutions, as stated by a prominent industry spokesperson.

    In their quest for expediency, automotive manufacturers are increasingly forging partnerships with smaller mining operations that may not necessarily meet the anticipated standards. According to Shay Natarajan, a partner at Mobility Impact Partners, a prominent private equity fund specializing in sustainable transportation investments, numerous instances of challenges have emerged in this domain. According to the expert, there is a possibility of a future collapse in lithium prices due to excessive production.

    The mining industry emerges as the clear victor in this scenario. The agreements forged by these entities with prominent automobile manufacturers consistently yield substantial profits while concurrently facilitating their access to capital through borrowing or share sales.

    [/vc_column_text][distance desktop_type=”30″][/vc_column][/vc_row][/vc_section]

  • Germany Eyes Critical Materials Fund of as Much as $1.1 Billion

    Germany Eyes Critical Materials Fund of as Much as $1.1 Billion

    [vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][distance desktop_type=”30″][lvs][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_btn title=”Source – Bloomberg” color=”sky” i_type=”material” i_icon_material=”vc-material vc-material-perm_device_information” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloomberg.com%2Fnews%2Farticles%2F2023-06-26%2Fgermany-eyes-critical-materials-fund-of-as-much-as-1-1-billion%23%3A~%3Atext%3DGermany%2520plans%2520to%2520set%2520up%2CEconomy%2520Minister%2520Robert%2520Habeck%2520said|target:_blank”][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_column_text]Germany plans to set up a state fund worth between €500 million and €1 billion ($546 million to $1.1 billion) to support the mining of raw materials critical to accelerate the country’s green transition, Economy Minister Robert Habeck said.

    The amount is around half that previously being considered, however, reflecting new spending constraints as the government tries to slash its budget for next year. People familiar with the matter told Bloomberg in April it could total as much as €2 billion.

    A Few Countries Dominate Production of Critical Raw Materials

    Top producers of the most production-concentrated critical raw materials

    Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

    Note: *gold, platinum, iridium, osmium, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium | **germanium, vanadium, gallium, hafnium, indium, niobium, rhenium

    Europe wants to reduce its dependence on China for key commodities by diversifying supply chains and working more closely with like-minded partners. The European Union expects its green and digital transitions to lead to exponential demand for critical metals and minerals such as those used in photovoltaic cells, wind turbines and electronic equipment.

    “We’re discussing the option of using equity capital,” Habeck told a news conference in Berlin following a meeting with French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire and Italian Industry Minister Adolfo Urso. Germany’s KfW Development Bank could take part in projects or even take stakes, he said.

    The Economy Ministry has finalized the concept but not yet reached an agreement with other ministries, he added. Finance Minister Christian Lindner wants to cut the 2024 budget by €20 billion, with reductions in expenditure in all departments except defense.

    Habeck said Germany must be able to offer similar financing instruments to those available in France or Italy, warning that “otherwise German companies would be disadvantaged against others.”

    In its Critical Raw Materials Act launched in March, the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, proposed that member states should extract 10% of the critical raw materials the bloc needs domestically by 2030.

    [/vc_column_text][distance desktop_type=”30″][/vc_column][/vc_row][/vc_section]

  • Europe ‘too focused’ on ESG, Glencore CEO says

    Europe ‘too focused’ on ESG, Glencore CEO says

    [vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][distance desktop_type=”30″][lvs][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_btn title=”Source – Washington Examiner” color=”sky” i_type=”material” i_icon_material=”vc-material vc-material-perm_device_information” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fpolicy%2Fenergy-environment%2Feurope-too-focused-esg-glencore-ceo|target:_blank”][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_column_text]Glencore CEO Gary Nagle took aim at European investors this week for being too focused on environmental, social, and governance, or ESG factors, which he said were taking precedence above financial returns.

    Speaking at a mining event in London on Thursday night, Nagle sought to defend Glencore’s proposal to create a spinoff of its coal business in New York rather than in the British capital, a move it ultimately opted against.

    During that event, he defended U.S. investors as “more pragmatic” than their European counterparts, noting that his conversations in deciding whether to create the New York spinoff highlighted the vast differences between U.S. and European financial considerations and priorities.

    “In Europe, investors seem a little bit more focused on ESG, and it seems to be the ESG desk that makes more decisions — and returns are sometimes put second or third in the list,” Nagle said at the Melbourne Mining Club event in London.

    “That’s a concern for us,” he said.

    Nagle’s remarks come as some oil and gas majors, including Shell and BP, continued to have higher valuations in the United States, even after both companies have softened their commitments on climate and continue to invest in new production and exploration projects.

    “American investors, in my view, seem to take a more pragmatic approach towards [ESG], where they want the yield,” Nagle said, compared to European institutions that he said seem to be run by the “ESG desk.”

    Glencore is not actively considering the move to New York, Nagle said, but he did not rule out moving the company’s listing to New York in the future.

    “If we’re in a situation where we feel we are not getting the recognition, not getting the valuation, and not getting the pool of capital for us in London, then it is something we would potentially consider. But it’s certainly not something we would consider now,” he said.[/vc_column_text][distance desktop_type=”30″][/vc_column][/vc_row][/vc_section]

  • EU countries seek to stretch raw material targets, add aluminum

    EU countries seek to stretch raw material targets, add aluminum

    [vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][distance desktop_type=”30″][lvs][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_btn title=”Source – Mining.com” color=”sky” i_type=”material” i_icon_material=”vc-material vc-material-perm_device_information” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mining.com%2Fweb%2Feu-countries-seek-to-stretch-raw-material-targets-add-aluminum%2F|target:_blank”][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_column_text]European Union countries agreed on Friday to raise proposed targets for recycling and processing of raw materials required for its green transition and added aluminum to the list of essential minerals.

    The Critical Raw Materials Act is a centrepiece of the EU strategy to ensure its industry can compete with the United States and China in making clean tech products and accessing the necessary raw materials.

    The European Commission proposed in March that EU extraction of 16 “strategic raw materials”, including lithium and copper, should rise to 10% of EU annual consumption by 2030, EU recycling to 15% and EU processing to 40%. No more than 65% of a material should come from a single third country.

    EU countries agreed on Friday that the targets for recycling and processing should rise to 20% and 50% respectively, according to EU diplomats.

    They also proposed adding aluminum, alumina (aluminum oxide) and bauxite (the principle aluminum ore) to the list of strategic raw materials.

    Bauxite was already among 34 “critical raw materials”, a group that includes all the strategic raw materials and other items such as arsenic and coking coal.

    The act foresees simpler permitting procedure for critical raw material projects, monitoring to mitigate possible supply risks, increased recycling and diversification of imports.

    The Council, representing EU countries, will still have to agree a final text of the law with the European Parliament, which is expected to establish its position in October.

    The Council and parliament aim to conclude negotiations on the text by the end of the year.[/vc_column_text][distance desktop_type=”30″][/vc_column][/vc_row][/vc_section]

  • Why a Bosnian silver mine will help the West in metals race

    Why a Bosnian silver mine will help the West in metals race

    [vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][distance desktop_type=”30″][lvs][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_btn title=”Source – thisismoney.co.uk” color=”sky” i_type=”material” i_icon_material=”vc-material vc-material-perm_device_information” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thisismoney.co.uk%2Fmoney%2Fmarkets%2Farticle-12253951%2FWhy-Bosnian-silver-help-West-metals-race.html|target:_blank”][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_column_text]Tucked away in the Bosnian mountains about an hour from the capital Sarajevo, one of the biggest new mining projects in Europe is nearing completion.

    The Vares silver and zinc mine, run by London-listed Adriatic Metals, is due to start production this year.

    It will be one of the few major sites on the Continent developing metals crucial to the green revolution – and, its backers say, is a project desperately needed to stop China from establishing total dominance over increasingly important resources.

    Vares has won support on the ground because it has helped to boost the local economy. But international investors, politicians and manufacturers are championing it because a project like this in Europe could lessen China’s stranglehold on materials needed for the green revolution, even if just a bit.

    Silver, whose conductivity makes it ideal for use in wind turbines, and other traditional metals such as copper will be crucial.

    But so will a group of materials known as ‘critical’ metals and minerals. These include lithium, used in batteries, rare earth minerals used in electric car magnets, cobalt, most notably used in iPhones, and a slew of others. Some senior industry figures fear China’s lead in this sphere is a greater threat to the West than its strides in technology or a possible invasion of Taiwan.

    The world in 2040 is expected to need four times as much of these critical metals as it does today to build green technologies if it is even to come close to meeting net zero carbon targets.

    The UK and the European Union have woken up to how badly the West is lagging in terms of its supply, and of the risks of being dependent on China. Both have scrambled to publish strategies laying out policies and potential funding channels.

    The EU has arguably been more engaged, starting on a strategy more than a decade ago. The UK blueprint, released last year, sketched out plans to turn it into a mining powerhouse, including investing in processing plants, opening mines and setting up factories to recycle green materials. Asked if the UK and Europe should be mining more, Peter Handley, head of the European Commission’s Critical Raw Materials Unit, says: ‘Where better to ensure mining, refining and recycling critical raw materials is done sustainably than on our own territory?

    ‘The green and digital transitions will massively increase our need for these materials, and access is not at all a given. The economies of the future will no longer rely on oil and coal, but on lithium, silicon and rare earth pigments.’

    A strategy is one thing, executing it is another, says George Bennett, head of London-listed Rainbow Rare Earths, adding: ‘The plans are great, but they haven’t materialised yet.’

    Rainbow has a mine in South Africa, and the US government is effectively an investor as it backs one of Rainbow’s major shareholders. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development is an investor in Adriatic’s venture. In the UK, a lot of support has been via grants.

    The deposits being evaluated in Britain include lithium in Cornwall, where there could be huge reserves. A new mining era in the county came a step closer last week when start-up British Lithium agreed a deal with a French miner. The project could employ 300 people and produce enough lithium for 500,000 electric cars a year by 2030. A rival, Cornish Lithium, which plans to extract lithium from geothermal waters, needs to raise cash to keep going.

    Unlike in China, opening mines in the UK or EU can be controversial and attract protests, and there is no guarantee projects will win approval. But developing them is ‘absolutely necessary’ to help lessen dependence on China, says Adriatic’s chief executive, Paul Cronin.

    Jeff Townsend, head of the Critical Minerals Association, says: ‘China started its critical mineral strategy in the 1970s. It knows it’s got a diplomatic and economic weapon. At this stage, you cannot stop China dominating the scene – but you can stop it from controlling it.'[/vc_column_text][distance desktop_type=”30″][/vc_column][/vc_row][/vc_section]

  • Korea reacts to nuclear demand with plans for 10 overseas plants

    Korea reacts to nuclear demand with plans for 10 overseas plants

    [vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][distance desktop_type=”30″][lvs][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_btn title=”Source – Korea JoongAng Daily” color=”sky” i_type=”material” i_icon_material=”vc-material vc-material-perm_device_information” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fkoreajoongangdaily.joins.com%2F2023%2F06%2F29%2Fbusiness%2Findustry%2Fnuclear-plant-nuclear-plant-export-KHNP%2F20230629174521090.html|target:_blank”][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_column_text]Korea is looking to become a powerhouse in nuclear power plant exports with government plans to export 10 nuclear plants by 2030. Poland, the Czech Republic, Turkey and Romania are potential candidates to host Korea’s second-ever nuclear plant export.

    The first nuclear power plant export deal was to construct a plant in Barakah, the United Arab Emirates, which began operations earlier this year. However, Korea is yet to ink its second export deal.

    Separate from these full nuclear power plant export agreements, Korea sealed a 195-million-euro ($212.4 million) nuclear facility deal with Romania Tuesday, securing Korea’s biggest-ever deal for a single nuclear facility and the Yoon Suk Yeol government’s second nuclear facility export following the El-Dabaa project in Egypt from August last year.

    The Patnow nuclear power plant project in Poland is the most likely destination for the second full nuclear power plant export, according to sources from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy and Korea Hydrogen & Nuclear Power (KHNP) Wednesday.

    The Patnow project will build two nuclear plants using the homemade APR1400 reactor technology. KHNP signed a letter of intent with Poland’s Zespol Elektrowni Patnow-Adamov-Konin and state-owned Polska Grupa Energetyczna (PGE) for the 1.4-gigawatt project.

    Korean and Polish officials are undertaking working-level talks to seal a service contract for a feasibility study of the Patnow plant.

    The Czech Republic’s 1.2-gigawatt Dukovany nuclear plant project, a deal estimated to be worth 6 billion euros, is another project the Korean government is eyeing. KHNP submitted its bid in November and is competing with France’s EDF and U.S. Westinghouse. The Eastern European country plans to select the winner by next year.

    Korea Electric Power Corporation in January submitted a preliminary bid to the Turkish government for a $30 billion project building four APR1400 plants, delivering 1.4 gigawatts of electricity apiece, in the northern region of the country. The two parties plan to begin a feasibility study next year, after which a memorandum of understanding to break ground could be signed.

    Romania recently rose as a possible export target following KHNP’s agreement with Romania’s Nuclearelectrica to build a tritium removal facility in Romania.

    Nuclearelectrica CEO Cosmin Ghita said during Tuesday’s signing ceremony in central Seoul that KHNP may be involved in future Romanian projects considering its technology.

    President Yoon has placed nuclear power plant export deals high on his political agenda, making an effort for a comeback from the previous Moon Jae-in administration’s nuclear phase-out scheme.

    Korea will have to overcome some of the variables lying ahead, such as its legal disputes with the United States over nuclear power plant exports.

    Pittsburgh-based Westinghouse filed a lawsuit against KHNP for intellectual property infringement in October claiming that KHNP needs U.S. government approval to sell APR1400 plants overseas because APR1400 reactors are created based on Westinghouse technology.

    KHNP argued that APR1400 is free from U.S. export restrictions because its core technology is domestically developed.

    “The Westinghouse lawsuit is about to obstruct nuclear power plant export plans one after the other […] settling this issue is a top priority,” a source from the nuclear plant industry told the JoongAng Ilbo on condition of anonymity.[/vc_column_text][distance desktop_type=”30″][/vc_column][/vc_row][/vc_section]

  • EU and Germany Join Forces to Boost Rwanda’s Mining Sector

    EU and Germany Join Forces to Boost Rwanda’s Mining Sector

    [vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][distance desktop_type=”30″][lvs][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_btn title=”Source – European Interest” color=”sky” i_type=”material” i_icon_material=”vc-material vc-material-perm_device_information” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fwww.europeaninterest.eu%2Farticle%2Feu-and-germany-join-forces-to-boost-rwandas-mining-sector%2F|target:_blank”][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_column_text]During the EU-Rwanda Business Forum in Kigali, the Rwanda Mines, Petroleum, and Gas Board (RMB) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH launched the ‘Sustainable Development of the Mining Sector in Rwanda’ project – underscoring their commitment to driving sustainable growth in the country’s mining industry.

    The project launch, officiated by EU Director-General for International Partnerships, Mr. Koen Doens; RMB CEO, Amb. Yamina Karitanyi and GIZ Rwanda Country Director, Mr. Martin Kraft, signifies a significant milestone towards strengthening entrepreneurship, improving the business environment, and enhancing investment attractiveness in Rwanda’s mining sector.

    The project is jointly funded by the European Union and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and will be implemented by GIZ in cooperation with RMB. Aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), it aims to enhance compliance with international minerals sourcing standards, support sector digitalization, strengthen technical and vocational education and training (TVET) skills in the mining sector, and improve the application of international social and environmental protection standards.

    “This partnership will support Rwanda’s commitment to sustainable and responsible practices in mining, enhance ongoing efforts towards the sector’s professionalisation, compliance and digitalization,” said Amb. Yamina Karitanyi, the Chief Executive Officer of Rwanda Mines, Petroleum and Gas Board.

    “We are excited to witness today the launch of the project jointly funded by the European Union and the BMZ to support sustainable development of the mining sector in Rwanda. This multi-donor action aims to strengthen the contribution of the mining sector to economic and social development through a holistic, complementary, and demand-oriented capacity development approach. The mining sector in Rwanda has outstanding growth potential. The EU-Rwanda Business Forum seeks to mobilise European investors for consolidating the artisanal mining sector and setting up modern value-additive processing and exploration. Team Europe is here to support Rwanda’s ambition to develop domestic industry into a regional hub for mineral services and promote scale and sustainability,” stressed Belen Calvo Uyarra, Ambassador of the European Union to Rwanda.

    The European Union has been actively engaged in Rwanda, advocating for sustainable development and supporting initiatives that promote economic growth and create opportunities for its citizens. GIZ, commissioned by BMZ, brings its expertise and experience to drive impactful interventions and foster sustainable practices. This collaborative effort between the EU, Germany, and RMB aims to bolster Rwanda’s contribution to the regional, continental and global mining industry.[/vc_column_text][distance desktop_type=”30″][/vc_column][/vc_row][/vc_section]

  • Brussels delays billions in recovery funds after Romania halts coal unit closures

    Brussels delays billions in recovery funds after Romania halts coal unit closures

    [vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][distance desktop_type=”30″][lvs][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_btn title=”Source – Energy Transition” color=”sky” i_type=”material” i_icon_material=”vc-material vc-material-perm_device_information” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fenergytransition.org%2F2023%2F06%2Fbrussels-delays-billions-in-recovery-funds-after-romania-halts-coal-unit-closures%2F|target:_blank”][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_column_text]By the end of 2022, Romania had met only 33 of the 55 milestones established in its multi-billion euro National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP). Most problematically, major provisions around lignite-fired power plant closures remain blocked. Days before the first coal units were set to shutter, citing the ongoing war in Ukraine, lawmakers in Bucharest decided to delay closure until October 2023. While also moving forward with the construction of both new EU-funded fossil gas plants as well as U.S. subsidized nuclear reactors, NGOs and activists worry Bucharest is simply trying to cash in on the recovery monies while playing the European Union. Now regulators in Brussels have taken notice by delaying disbursement of billions in much needed green energy funding. Continuing the Romanian Power Move series, lead blogger and podcaster, Michael Buchsbaum reviews the unfolding situation.

    The Rovinari Power Station in Romania. Credits: CristianChirita | WikiMedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

     

    Dubious decisions

    After years of negotiations between the European Union and Bucharest, as of early December 2022, Romania’s energy transition, specifically the winding down of coal mining and burning following the long delayed and highly controversial restructuring plan of state-owned energy producer, Oltenia Energy Complex (CEO), was seemingly a done deal.

    With the first units set to switch off by year’s end, officials in Brussels and civil society were looking forward to celebrating the start of a ten-year coal phase out concluding no later than 2032.

    But hardly was the ink dry on the approved closure schedule before Romania’s parliament passed a series of amendments, including an Emergency Ordinance, to delay unit shutdowns.

    Following rancorous debates around the scheduled decommissioning of Rovinari 3 and Turceni 7, with a combined total of 660 MW, amendments were first adopted to place both into a strategic reserve.

    But then two weeks later another decision was made to delay closure, scheduled to commence on December 31, 2022, until October 2023, nine months later.

    In the weeks since negotiations with Brussels ended, “there have been a lot of dubious decisions,” Alexandra Doroftei, a coal campaigner at Bankwatch Romania related in an email following queries about the nation’s evolving energy situation.

    Claiming these changes have largely been made without proper public consultation, in an interview with Energytransition.org, Bankwatch accuses the government of using the war in Ukraine and fears of an energy crisis to impede progress.

    As it stands, the law’s “final form contradicts the commitments assumed through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) in terms of the decarbonization timeline,” said Laura Nazare, Bankwatch’s National Campaign coordinator in an emailed response to questions.

    After approval by the European Commission last year, that plan included a firm coal power plant retirement and mine closure calendar, one Bucharest has now violated.

    Forest cut down to expand coal mines

    In January, again contrary to the NRRP, the Romanian government decided to cut down a 106-hectare forest so that state-owned CEO could expand the Timișeni-Pinoasa mine in Gorj county to some 8 million tonnes per year.

    However, as Doroftei reminds, the combined deforestation and increase in production “will have a double negative effect on the environment by increasing both emissions and reducing absorption capacities.”

    Moreover, since meeting each step of Romania’s decarbonisation laws remains central towards the nation actually receiving the full funding of its EU approved and financed NRRP, Brussels has taken notice.

    Funding delayed

    The purpose of the decarbonization law within the NRRP is to establish the framework for reducing CO2 emissions in the energy sector, however, “the most recent changes will have exactly the opposite effect, lamented Doroftei.

    “The actions of the Romanian government […] show that cashing in recovery funds is its main motivation, not real measures to decrease CO2 emissions and advance the energy transformation,” continued Doroftei.

    Given that both the decarbonization law as well as steps towards closure needed to be completed by the end of 2022 for the nation to receive the second rich tranche of EU recovery funds, as of February 2023, Brussels began formally delaying disbursements.

    Though as of this writing negotiations continue, so long as the mining and coal-unit closure schedule remains either undetermined or in disagreement, Romania, with the second lowest GDP within the European Union, is risking almost €3.25 billion in vital EU funds, almost two-thirds of which come in the form of grants, from this second tranche.

    And if this impasse continues, Romania’s coal addiction may jeopardize the scheduled third tranche as well.

    Gas and nuclear moving ahead

    While Romania is actively stalling CEO’s coal phase out, it is moving ahead with both the construction of new fossil gas power plants as well as more nuclear capacity.

    Of Romania’s five lignite-fired power plants, three are planned to be switched to fossil gas.

    With their conversion supported by financing from the NRRP, at least two will supposedly be “ready for hydrogen” when built.

    All the planned new gas plants will burn fossil gas coming from either the Neptun Deep offshore project in the Black Sea (with operations to begin in 2027), or from other national onshore or offshore gas resources as well as imports through existing gas interconnections.

    Commissioning for the new plants is scheduled for 2026

    Simultaneous to its coal-to-gas conversion plans, with backing from the United States, the government continues preparations to become the first European nation to host a small modular nuclear reactor plant (SMR).

    In early 2023, producer NuScale Power signed a contract for Front-End Engineering and Design (FEED), a significant step toward its planned deployment at the formerly coal-fired Doicesti Power Station, about 90 km from Bucharest.

    Each SMR is projected to generate 77 megawatts of electricity (MWe), with state-owned companies planning to construct a six-module 462 MWe plant.

    Though authorities have already started clearing the site to make space for the new SMRs, Greenpeace Romania claims the location was determined without properly consulting the local community, nor providing enough information on the associated risks, costs and other relevant details.

    Additionally, last December, the Ministry of Energy put forward a draft law regarding two new reactor units at the Cernavoda Nuclear power plant. With financing from the U.S., and a combined 1400 MW capacity, Unit 3 is scheduled to being operating in 2030, followed by Unit 4 the following year.

    But with costs still estimated to exceed €7 billion, “imagine how many rooftop PVs could be installed all over the country instead?” asked Nazare in our interview.

    Instead of actually supporting vulnerable consumers suffering today from energy poverty with the deployment of solar and wind energy, Nazare fumes that authorities are unfortunately accelerating expensive, risky and environmentally dangerous investments.

    €2 bln received from the EU Just Transition Fund 

    While holding up its coal phase out, Romania has begun receiving billions from the EU’s Just Transition Fund (JTF) designated to support the movement towards a greener economy. In the next blog we’ll review plans to rapidly expand re-training programs for affected coal workers as well as examine Bucharest’s scheme to more broadly install rooftop solar.[/vc_column_text][distance desktop_type=”30″][/vc_column][/vc_row][/vc_section]

  • Romania’s Alro investing $11 mln in recycling station

    Romania’s Alro investing $11 mln in recycling station

    [vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][distance desktop_type=”30″][lvs][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_btn title=”Source – SeeNews” color=”sky” i_type=”material” i_icon_material=”vc-material vc-material-perm_device_information” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fseenews.com%2Fnews%2Fromanias-alro-investing-11-mln-in-recycling-station-827140|target:_blank”][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_column_text]June 29 (SeeNews) – Romanian aluminium producer Alro [BSE:ALR] said on Thursday that it has invested $11 million (10 million euro) in a recycling plant

    The new facility located at Alro’s business site in the southern county of Slatina will increases the company’s scrap aluminium recycling capacity by 60,000 tonnes per year, it said in a filing with the Bucharest Stock Exchange.

    The installation comprises two double-chamber furnaces, one holding furnace and the related fume collection and treatment plant.

    “While the very challenging business environment forced us to adapt our development plans to maintain our position on the international market, one strategic direction remained unchanged, namely our commitment to increase efficiency and reduce overall consumption, and the investment in the Eco Recycling Facility supports these plans,” said Marian Nastase, chairman of Alro’s board of directors.

    Alro is specialised in the production of primary and processed aluminium, with operations in Romania, China and Sierra Leone. In Romania, the company has an aluminium production unit in Slatina and an alumina plant in Tulcea.

    Alro shares traded flat at 1.625 lei ($0.35 euro/0.32 euro) as at 0945 CET on Thursday on the Bucharest Stock Exchange.

    ($=0.916136 euro)

    [/vc_column_text][distance desktop_type=”30″][/vc_column][/vc_row][/vc_section]

  • Lawsuits and blockades over lignite mine projects near Prijedor in BiH

    Lawsuits and blockades over lignite mine projects near Prijedor in BiH

    [vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][distance desktop_type=”30″][lvs][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_btn title=”Source – Balkan Green Energy News” color=”sky” i_type=”material” i_icon_material=”vc-material vc-material-perm_device_information” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fbalkangreenenergynews.com%2Flawsuits-and-blockades-over-lignite-mine-projects-near-prijedor-in-bih%2F|target:_blank”][distance desktop_type=”30″][vc_column_text]

    The announced opening of coal mines Bistrica and Bukova kosa in the municipality of Prijedor has caused concern among the local population, which appealed to the authorities to stop it. The residents of Bistrica have organized blockades of local roads, arguing the environmental impact would be disastrous. The villagers told the authorities that around 90,000 tons of coal from Bistrica would not help alleviate the energy crisis.

    Lignite mining concessions in Prijedor would be illegal, according to the Center for Environment (CZŽS). Projects are under development in the village of Bistrica and at the Bukova kosa site in the Potkozarje area in northwest Bosnia and Herzegovina.

    If coal extraction starts, the consequences will be catastrophic, both for the health and the lives of the residents, they warned at a press conference held at the Center for Environment.

    In both cases, the company Drvo-Export from Teslić has submitted unsolicited offers for concessions. The opening of lignite mines in the municipality of Prijedor would have catastrophic consequences for the environment, the environmentalist group claimed.

    Barricades prevent mine opening in Bistrica

    The villagers from Bistrica have taken to the barricades and sent an open letter to the municipal authority.

    “We are aware of the current energy crisis that has gripped the world, but we are also certain that around 90,000 tons of coal from Bistrica will not help alleviate that energy crisis,” they said and asked decision makers to stop the devastation.

    Bistrica residents: We are aware of the current energy crisis that has gripped the world, but we are also certain that around 90,000 tons of coal from Bistrica will not help or alleviate that energy crisis.

    One of the most beautiful villages in Potkozarje, with over 700 residents, is at risk of becoming a mine and everyone will have to evacuate, its inhabitants warned.

    Photo: Čuvari Bistrice / facebook

    The residents are sitting on the road, preventing the machinery from passing toward the mining project site. They spent a night on the barricades.

    In the case of Bistrica, there has been a flagrant violation of the human right to a healthy environment and a peaceful and family life, property rights and public order and peace, CZŽS pointed out. Unidentified vehicles are making interventions in the area without any formal notification about the works. Access roads are being created and expanded without permits, and no one is reacting to it, the environmentalists added.

    “We were forced to file a criminal complaint against unidentified persons due to the occupation and arbitrary exploitation of public property,” said Redžib Skomorac, legal advisor at the Center the Environment.

    Concession for Bukova kosa mine site in legal dispute

    Skomorac stressed there is no legal basis for granting concessions, arguing that the Municipality of Prijedor lacks a document on concession allocation policy. 

    Skomorac: There is no legal basis for granting concessions.

    The center has filed lawsuits against the decision of the Government of the Republic of Srpska to initiate a concession procedure for coal exploration at the Bukova kosa site.

    Skomorac said that if the entity government does the same for the Bistrica site, CZŽS would also file a lawsuit.

    As reported by the local media, the City Assembly will hold a special session today on mining in Prijedor, and the residents of Bistrica plan to address the councilors with a request to halt the works.

    Mining operations would pose threat to water sources

    Miroslav Curić, a representative of three local communities, recalled that there was already a mine in the area during World War II. The coal was later found to have a high sulfur content, between 8% and 12%, he added.

    This coal is of poor quality, and its use would greatly endanger the environment and the health of the population, Curić said. He warned that water sources would be jeopardized.[/vc_column_text][distance desktop_type=”30″][/vc_column][/vc_row][/vc_section]