Website: Eurasia.com

  • Tajikistan or Britain? Origin of famous Bronze Age tin ingots sparks controversy

    Tajikistan or Britain? Origin of famous Bronze Age tin ingots sparks controversy

    Tin was used in the Bronze Age for 150 years. Bronze is an alloy of copper and tin, and in the Bronze Age, it was used to make a range of goods including swords, helmets, bracelets, plates and pitchers. A recent study by a team of archaeometallurgists refutes previous findings published in 2022, which state that most of the tin came from the Mushiston tin deposit in northwestern Tajikistan, as well as from two mines in the Taurus Mountains near the present-day Turkish-Syrian border.

    For this previous analysis, researchers took samples of 105 tin ingots from the wreck, determining chemical and isotopic signatures of 90% of the tin cargo. In particular, they measured the isotope ratios of tin and lead, which, like the chemical composition, provide clues to the origin of the tin.

    Also, the proportion of the trace element tellurium points to tin deposits in Central Asia. The group claims to be able to infer a clear attribution based on the matching signatures between the ingots from Uluburun and tin ore samples from the above mentioned mines.

    But according to the new paper, the data doesn’t support this interpretation or a clear conclusion.

    For the current study, Daniel Berger from the Curt Engelhorn Center for Archaeometry (CEZA), extensively checked chemical and isotopic analyses from previous studies and cross-checked them with the 2022 data set.

    “Due to the isotopic ratios and chemical characteristics, it would be even more likely that at least part of the cargo of tin ingots from the Uluburun shipwreck originated from Cornwall in Britain,” Berger said. “In particular, the comparison with Bronze Age tin ingots from Britain and Israel which we have considered in the past on a similar question of origin suggests this conclusion.”

    He added that more samples and analyses of ores from European and Asian tin deposits were needed.

    Overall, the Bronze Age lasted from the late fourth millennium to the early first millennium BCE—but with different beginnings and ends depending on the region of the world. Bronze, an alloy of copper and tin in a ratio of nine to one, is significantly harder than copper alone.

    Copper ores are found in many regions of Eurasia and Africa. However, tin ores that were accessible in the Bronze Age can only be found in a few places in Central Asia, Iran and Europe.

    It is all the more astonishing that some of the earliest bronze artifacts have been found in the Mesopotamian city-states of the Tigris–Euphrates river system. But there are no tin deposits there; the metal had to be obtained via long-distance trade.

    “Numerous archaeological finds show that the British Isles and Central Europe formed an economic sphere with the Mediterranean region in the Bronze Age and was connected via the transport routes of the Danube, Rhine and Rhône rivers, or via the ocean,” Ernst Pernicka, co-author of the new paper, said. “For instance, amber beads likely traded from the Baltic were found in the Uluburun wreck, indicating the existence of north-south trade routes.”

    The use of standardized weights had already spread in the course of the second millennium BCE, coming from Egypt and Mesopotamia, via Syria, Anatolia and the Aegean, and across the Alps to Central Europe. These standard weights were used to weigh merchandise, including tin ingots.

    For the time of the Uluburun ship, neither weight systems nor established trade connections to Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean can be documented for Central Asia, which underscores the likelihood that the tin originated from the West.

     

  • Kazatomprom to end uranium production cuts in 2025

    Kazatomprom to end uranium production cuts in 2025

    “Kazatomprom remains committed to its market-centric strategy and its disciplined approach to production and sales, and we’re excited to witness the start of a long-awaited historical shift in the uranium market,” Dastan Kosherbayev, chief commercial officer of Kazatomprom, said in a statement.
    “As we are seeing a clear sign that the industry has entered into the new long-term contracting cycle, driven by the recognition of the restocking needs, Kazatomprom, with its best-class and lowest cost mines, is absolutely prepared to respond to these improving market conditions”.

    The spot price of uranium has more than doubled over the past three years, although it is still well down from a peak of $140 a pound touched in 2007.

    For seven years including 2023, the company has produced 20% less than its contracts with the Kazakh government allowed, with this year’s output seen at 20,500-21,500 tonnes.

    In 2024, Kazatomprom said it would stick to its plan to produce 10% below the contract maximum, or 25,000-25,500 tonnes, while with no restrictions in 2025, production is expected to grow to 30,500-31,500 tonnes, the company said.

    “…Our intention to return to a 100% level of Subsoil Use Contracts production volumes in 2025 is primarily driven by our strong contract-book and already growing sales portfolio against conservative 2023-2024 production scenario,” Kosherbayev said.

  • Kazakhstani National Geological Servey will receive assistance in avoiding mistakes

    Kazakhstani National Geological Servey will receive assistance in avoiding mistakes

    The British Geological Survey, with its extensive experience, will share its knowledge with its Kazakhstani counterparts. The collaboration between the British Geological Survey (BGS) and the National Geological Service (NGS) of Kazakhstan is set to be closely coordinated. During his visit to Astana, David Schofield, the director of BGS for international geological research, shed light on this international partnership.

    “The British Geological Survey is the world’s oldest organization of its kind. Our primary focus involves describing the geology of the United Kingdom, generating geological information, and disseminating it to stakeholders interested in natural resources. This includes data on water resources, construction-related information, as well as potential hazards like landslides. Consequently, we collaborate with various industries. Furthermore, we have a strong tradition of sending our geologists abroad to enhance geological services in other countries. The primary motivation behind our international efforts is global development and supporting the implementation of British trade and foreign policy,” shared the geologist.

    During their visit to Kazakhstan, BGS specialists engaged in fruitful discussions with their counterparts from the recently established National Geological Service of Kazakhstan.

    “The organization is relatively young and faces several challenges that need to be addressed. However, they have made a promising start. One area where we can offer assistance is in the digital transformation of a substantial amount of accumulated data. We can help bring this data into the digital realm and make it more accessible to a wider audience. We have accumulated considerable experience in this domain over the past 25 years, learning valuable lessons along the way. By sharing our experience, we hope that the NGS of Kazakhstan can avoid the mistakes we’ve unfortunately made. Additionally, we possess expertise in ore deposit analysis, hydrology, and other challenges, where our knowledge can be of value,” noted the specialist.

    Currently, the collaborating geological organizations are actively discussing potential areas of cooperation. Recognizing their shared objectives, BGS and NGS intend to establish a working plan for the next two to three years.

    According to the minerals.gov.kz website, the British Geological Survey plans to collaborate with “Kazakhstan Garish Sapary,” which operates a geological IT platform, as reported by inbusiness.kz.
    In the course of their conversation, the head of the National Geological Service (NGS) elucidated that this subsidiary of the geological committee acts as the national custodian of the state’s accumulated geological data. However, it does not possess any deposits, assets, or laboratories.

    Concerning the fees for the services provided by the National Geological Service, Erlan Galiev clarified that the pricing methodology is presently under discussion within the organization. He underscored that the calculation will now be based on the number of pages in the report, rather than solely on the report itself.

    “There are various approaches to assessing geological information. For instance, one could commence with historical expenses. Let’s say, back in the 1970s, an expedition was dispatched, wells were drilled, various operations were conducted, money was expended, and this report was created, subsequently submitted to the funds. Now, let’s assume we propose that 1% of the total cost of these activities should be the price of this report. It would not be just a million; considering the inflation that has transpired since then, it would be exorbitantly high, excessively expensive. We will not tread down that path, but merely for your comprehension, the value ascribed to geological information presently is abysmally low, simply catastrophic. The actual expenditure incurred far exceeds what a mining user pays for this report at present, rendering it a rather meager amount, allowing them to utilize the information freely. Therefore, we are currently contemplating and acknowledging that the provision of geological information should be streamlined, transparent, and expedited as much as possible. We are diligently working towards that goal,” expounded the esteemed NGS executive.

  • Anglo Asian Mining may secure a loan to fulfill its obligations

    Anglo Asian Mining may secure a loan to fulfill its obligations

    Anglo Asian Mining, a renowned player in the gold, silver, and copper mining sector in Azerbaijan, is considering the possibility of securing a loan to meet the recommendations put forth by the international monitoring company Micon. These recommendations are based on the findings of waste monitoring conducted in the village of Seyudlyu, located in the Gedabey district.

    In response to a question posed by a correspondent from Report dispatched to Seyudlyu, Reza Vaziri, the General Director of Anglo-Asian Mining PLC, acknowledged that despite the company’s consistent profitability, recent events have resulted in approximately $19 million in damages. Vaziri emphasized the importance of fulfilling these obligations and mentioned the potential approach to banks for assistance. He expressed confidence in the trust banks place in the company’s creditworthiness when it comes to loan arrangements.

  • Uzbekistan: Almalyk launches unique ferromolybdenum manufacture

    Uzbekistan: Almalyk launches unique ferromolybdenum manufacture

    Almalyk Mining and Processing Works has successfully implemented an innovative technique to produce ferromolybdenum. This remarkable achievement involves the utilization of molybdenum-containing wastes generated during the production of molybdenum.

    Ferromolybdenum, an alloy boasting a molybdenum content ranging from 50% to 70%, is the valuable output of this process. The company has initiated the manufacturing of 2 thousand kilograms of ferromolybdenum per month, with an impressive shipment of 5500 kilograms already dispatched to the esteemed Navoi Mining and Processing Works.

    Almalyk aims to produce ferromolybdenum worth 170 billion soums by the year 2025. This ambitious goal reflects their commitment to further enhance their contribution to the industry.

  • Kazatomprom is represented at the country pavilion as part of the IAEA General Conference

    Kazatomprom is represented at the country pavilion as part of the IAEA General Conference

    On September 25th, during the 67th session of the General Conference of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) held in Vienna, Austria, the official inauguration of the national pavilion of the Republic of Kazakhstan took place. As reported by SKnews.kz, the pavilion showcased the remarkable achievements of Kazakhstan’s nuclear industry.

    Kazatomprom, the national atomic company, provided comprehensive information about its pivotal role in the global uranium market, its unwavering commitment to nuclear non-proliferation, its fruitful collaboration with the IAEA, and the commendable activities of the IAEA Low Enriched Uranium Bank situated at the Ulba Metallurgical Plant.

    Dignitaries from the Kazakhstani delegation and esteemed guests attending the international industry forum graced the event with their presence.

    “In recent years, Kazakhstan has made significant strides in the field of nuclear energy. Our nation has always recognized the potential of nuclear power to foster progress, while diligently upholding the highest standards of safety and environmental preservation. Today, we gather here to showcase the exceptional contributions of esteemed organizations such as the National Atomic Company ‘Kazatomprom,’ the National Nuclear Center of Kazakhstan, and the Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Ministry of Energy of Kazakhstan,” emphasized Almasadam Satkaliyev, the Minister of Energy of Kazakhstan, during his welcoming address.

    The inauguration of the Kazakhstani pavilion also featured a noteworthy speech by Mikhail Chudakov, the Deputy Director General of the IAEA. He underscored Kazakhstan’s pivotal role in the advancement of peaceful nuclear energy and its substantial contribution to mitigating the consequences of climate change, as well as in achieving global objectives for low-carbon development.

    Throughout the conference, the Kazakhstani delegation will actively participate in thematic sessions and engage in meetings with representatives from partner countries to discuss a wide array of matters pertaining to bilateral cooperation.

    It is anticipated that the conference will yield significant decisions concerning the development of the global nuclear industry.

  • Independent expert Telman Shuriev: Increasing the area of geological and geophysical exploration is a strategic task

    Independent expert Telman Shuriev: Increasing the area of geological and geophysical exploration is a strategic task

    Telman Shuriev, the head of the Industrial Asset Management Department at “NAC Kazatomprom” and a Doctor of Business Administration in Industrial Technology, sheds light on the key directions outlined in President Tokayev’s address to Kazakhstan regarding the development of the geological exploration and water sectors, as reported by inbusiness.kz.

    The President’s address to the nation demonstrates a forward-thinking approach towards a new economic model and takes into account the opinions of experts and the public. Notably, the development of geological exploration stands out as a strategically important decision. The President emphasizes the need to modernize the management system of the mining sector promptly. I find it particularly significant that the Head of State has set an ambitious goal of expanding the area of geological and geophysical exploration to a minimum of 2.2 million square meters within the next three years. This emphasis on the development of rare and rare-earth metal deposits is well-founded, considering Kazakhstan’s abundant reserves. It is expected that this sector will attract both domestic and foreign investors, especially as the country moves towards economic decarbonization, actively reducing greenhouse gas emissions and carbon intensity in its industries.

    President Tokayev also highlights the crucial role of water resources in Kazakhstan, placing them on the same level of importance as oil, gas, and metals. The establishment of an independent ministry dedicated to overseeing water issues signifies a significant step forward. This decision aligns with the practices of developed countries, where specialized agencies are created to focus on key areas of national development. Additionally, the re-establishment of the National Hydrogeological Service in Kazakhstan is of great importance. This institution will address water resource challenges and can be structured to operate independently of the state budget. By collaborating with investors and natural resource users, the National Hydrogeological Service can create a competitive environment and become a promising avenue for investment in Kazakhstan’s economy.

    Notably, experts in the field of ecology and hydrogeology in Kazakhstan have also expressed the need for a national company dedicated to managing groundwater. They emphasize the importance of transforming existing state-authorized enterprises into a unified entity that includes specialists from geology, hydrogeology, ecology, and the industrial sector. This approach, coupled with adequate state budget allocation, can pave the way for comprehensive work in this sector. For example, focusing on the underground Kokzhida deposit, located in the Aktobe Region’s Temir District, which has significant reserves capable of providing drinking water to the western region of the country.

    President Tokayev’s address sets a clear vision for the development of the geological exploration and water sectors, emphasizing the importance of these industries for Kazakhstan’s economy. With the implementation of modernized management systems and the reorganization of government agencies, the country is well-positioned to capitalize on its abundant reserves and address critical challenges in these sectors, attracting investment and driving sustainable development.
    The issue of accessibility and quality of water resources in Kazakhstan is a matter of great significance. Currently, Kazakhstan ranks 70th in terms of access to quality water supply, making it one of the most water-deficient countries in the Eurasian continent. Within Asia, it stands at the 8th position in terms of water deficiency, with only 2.8% of its territory covered by water, while arid zones comprise two-thirds of the land. In essence, Kazakhstan is heavily reliant on water. This situation primarily arises from excessive regulation in the upper reaches of rivers, such as the construction of reservoirs and extensive water usage. Furthermore, the costs associated with irrational water consumption in these river basins, such as limited utilization of water-saving technologies, lack of automated water accounting, and underdeveloped agricultural cooperation, exacerbate the problem. Experts express concern that if these trends persist, Kazakhstan will face severe water supply challenges in the future, as natural surface water resources have been steadily declining in recent years. Additionally, climate change projections indicate a 14% to 40% decrease in water flow by 2030. It is evident that there is a lack of comprehensive policy for the development of the water supply sector, with previous programs focused more on restoring existing systems. Despite significant budget allocations and the adoption of state programs, many villages and regions still lack access to drinking water.

    Undoubtedly, the quality of governance significantly impacts the effectiveness of water policy. The deficiencies in ensuring the population’s access to drinking water can largely be attributed to the frequent reorganization of state bodies, resulting in the transfer of responsibilities of the Committee on Water Resources from one department to another. The management of water resources has been marred by wastefulness, as indicated by Kazakhstan’s assessment as the least efficient in terms of water governance according to the Global Water Partnership UN Water Governance and State of the World’s Water index. Another challenge stems from the absence of a single authorized body responsible for coordinating the implementation and management of policies related to providing the population with drinking water. Previously, these functions were divided between two ministries that did not effectively collaborate. Furthermore, local representative bodies (maslikhats) in the regions have played a limited role in monitoring the use of budget funds.

    To improve the situation in the water sector, several measures need to be taken. It is imperative to establish a unified monitoring system that tracks the availability of centralized water supply and the quality of drinking water in both urban and rural areas. This system should be entrusted to a single independent authority to avoid conflicts of interest. The normative and legal framework, as well as terminology, should be regulated. External specialists with expertise in water resource management should be engaged in developing goals, intentions, and efficiency indicators for each level of government. Priority attention must be given to training and capacity building of specialists in water resource management. Attracting investments for the construction of new pipelines and equipment types should be accompanied by strict consumption control.

    In his address, President Tokayev emphasized the responsible and prudent use of resources, including water. I wholeheartedly support this notion. The industrial sector, which accounts for approximately 25-30% of total water intake, deserves greater attention from government bodies. Of this proportion, 92% is sourced from surface water, while 8% comes from groundwater sources. Regrettably, only about 20% of industrial enterprises utilize water recycling technologies. Projections indicate that by 2030, industrial water intake will increase by another 10%, accounting for 35-40% of total water resources, while the overall quantity of water resources in the country is expected to decline. Assessing losses reveals that industrial consumers experience an average water loss of about 40% during transportation.

    To address these concerns, authorized bodies should collaborate with industrial companies to conduct accurate studies on losses and develop solutions for their reduction. Timelines for implementing these measures, along with appropriate funding, should be established. Initiating loss indicators and subsequently setting Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for their reduction is crucial. Currently, precise indicators in this regard are lacking. To commence this effort, allocating funds within the 1% for Research and Development (R&D) for subsoil users would be a prudent step.

    It is also worth noting that there is a deficiency in adequate and quality water consumption metering equipment, both at the inlet and outlet stages of production. Metering should be implemented at all stages, and it is essential to ensure that metering devices are in working order. Accurate data is indispensable for a comprehensive understanding of water management.

    Kazakhstan has already approved a Low Carbon Development Strategy until 2060, which encompasses clear indicators and potential tools for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in the industrial sector. Similarly, it is imperative for the country to develop a similar strategy for effective water resource management until 2050. This strategy should encompass indicators for water resources, with a high level of implementation. Such a strategy would provide industrial enterprises with guidance for their environmental policies, fostering a more coherent and systematic approach rather than chaotic“`
    I believe that it is a very timely decision to determine the current status of water for our country. Government bodies insufficiently pay attention to the consumption of the industrial sector, where about 25-30% of the total water intake is accounted for by industry, of which 92% is surface water and 8% is groundwater sources. It should be noted that only about 20% of industrial enterprises use water recycling technologies. Meanwhile, there is a forecast that by 2030, industrial water intake will increase by another 10% and will account for 35-40% of the total volume of water resources, while the quantity of water resources in the country will decrease. The assessment of losses shows us that water losses during transportation average about 40% for industrial consumers.

    In this regard, I would recommend that authorized bodies, in conjunction with industrial companies, conduct studies on accurate losses, develop solutions for their reduction, determine the timelines for the implementation of measures with the allocation of appropriate funds, establish the starting point for loss indicators, and then set KPIs for their reduction. Currently, there are no exact indicators in this direction. To start with, we can determine the funds allocated within the 1% for R&D for subsoil users.

    It is also worth noting that at the moment there is a lack of adequate and quality water consumption metering equipment at the inlet and outlet, not to mention the need for metering at all stages of production; on some enterprises, metering devices do not work at all, as a result, we do not have accurate data and, accordingly, do not see the full picture of water management.

    Kazakhstan has approved a Low Carbon Development Strategy until 2060, which includes clear indicators and possible tools for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including in the industrial sector. By analogy, our country needs to develop a similar strategy for effective water resource management until 2050, reflecting indicators for water resources, with a high status of implementation. This will provide industrial enterprises with guidance on the general direction of their environmental policy, rather than working in a chaotic manner.

  • Kazakhstan Energy Transition

    Kazakhstan Energy Transition

    Steppes to Net Zero

    This report provides a comprehensive perspective on Kazakhstan’s energy transition pathway, striking a delicate balance between energy costs, supply reliability, and environmental sustainability. It sheds light on the economic risks associated with continued support for coal-fired generation and highlights the need for international funding to assist the country in its just transition. While Kazakhstan’s individual contribution to global emissions may be limited, similar to that of Spain or France, its emissions intensity relative to GDP remains alarmingly high, with the energy sector being the primary source of greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for 82.4% of the country’s total emissions. Fuel combustion alone is responsible for 70.5% of Kazakhstan’s overall greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, the Central Asian region is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, further emphasizing the urgency of taking action.

    It is important to note that there is currently no political commitment to phase out coal due to concerns over potential disruption to the socio-spatial and economic balance. Political support for coal-fired technologies is driven by the inflexibility of the energy system and the legacy of district heating. However, maintaining support for coal in the long term poses significant economic risks and hinders investment in activities that could diversify Kazakhstan’s economy and facilitate a just transition.

    The upcoming decade or so will be crucial in laying the groundwork for the new economy. Failing to do so will result in economic stranding, as legacy revenue streams and traditional jobs dwindle without the offset from new, clean revenue streams and employment opportunities.

    Kazakhstan’s current low carbon price fails to incentivize energy transformation and proves to be an ineffective policy tool, especially considering the availability of free quotas. To facilitate Kazakhstan’s energy transition, it is imperative to establish a higher carbon price through reduced free quotas and government auctions.

    By 2030, the integration of renewable energy sources will necessitate the implementation of storage at scale to ensure system flexibility. Governmental planning and support for the rollout of storage infrastructure will be vital during this decade.

    Financial aid is essential for Kazakhstan to expedite its transition to clean energy. Blended concessional financing should be made available to facilitate the just transition from coal to clean power, contingent upon the existence of a credible coal phaseout plan.

    Current political and technological commitments run the risk of perpetuating the fossil fuel infrastructure and impeding the growth of renewables. Power prices are expected to rise significantly with the addition of new coal plants or retrofitting of existing ones. However, the inclusion of renewables, which have demonstrated declining price trends in renewable energy auctions, will lower power prices for end users. New coal plants are twice as expensive as new renewables with storage, and breaking even would require a doubling of power tariffs. Under our base scenario, new renewables will outcompete existing coal units within one year, while renewables with storage will be cost competitive within five years. It is crucial to accelerate and expand the deployment of renewables on a larger scale than currently envisioned.

  • Gold miner may revive London listing after Russian asset sale

    Gold miner may revive London listing after Russian asset sale

    Polymetal International’s CEO, Vitaly Nesis, has expressed the possibility of reviving the company’s London listing once its sanctioned Russian unit has been sold. Polymetal, a gold miner that derives approximately 70% of its sales from Russia and the remaining from Kazakhstan, recently re-domiciled from Jersey to Astana as a preliminary step towards spinning off its Russian business in compliance with Moscow’s restrictions. This move, however, made it impossible to maintain its London listing. Nevertheless, the Russian unit was put up for sale after being included in a US sanctions list in May. Once the sale is finalized, Polymetal will reconsider listing alternatives.

    Nesis revealed that there has been significant interest in the Russian business from over ten potential buyers, including investors from China who are willing to take on sanctions risks. At present, the two parts of the company operate as separate entities, with independent funding and management decisions. Nesis, as the CEO, receives periodic reports on the activities of the Russian unit. While sales in Russia were temporarily halted due to sanctions, they have now resumed.

    Due to restrictions on developing Russian assets, Polymetal is exploring alternative options. Nesis mentioned that they are evaluating opportunities in Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, considering potential acquisitions in those regions.

    Regarding the company’s future listing, Nesis stated that once the Russian assets are divested, they may consider a London listing over Dubai or Abu Dhabi. This decision reflects their strategic considerations and aligns with their future plans.

  • The company Polymetal has become a resident of Kazakhstan

    The company Polymetal has become a resident of Kazakhstan

    In a historic move, Polymetal, one of the world’s leading gold mining companies, has officially relocated its operations to Kazakhstan. This decision marks a significant milestone for the country’s stock market, as it is the first instance of a company making such a move. Furthermore, Polymetal has also shifted its primary trading platform from the London Stock Exchange to the Kazakhstan Stock Exchange. The reverberations of this decision within the stock market are examined in a report by a correspondent from “Habar 24.”

    Polymetal has successfully transitioned its jurisdiction and now stands as a proud resident of Kazakhstan. Already, approximately 4,000 shareholders from the United Kingdom, the United States, and Europe have transferred their shares to the AIX Exchange, signaling the beginning of a promising new chapter.

    Vitaly Nesis, the CEO of Polymetal International, expressed his satisfaction with the extensive efforts made over the past nine months. During this period, the company engaged in meetings with over 500 institutional and retail investors. Nesis believes that these interactions played a pivotal role in shifting sentiment. Ultimately, when the final vote on sequential listing and delisting from London took place, more than 90 percent of voting shareholders supported these decisions.

    Within the Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC), there is a shared anticipation that the influx of large investors brought about by Polymetal’s relocation will create fresh opportunities for other Kazakhstani companies.

    Renat Bekturov, the Managing Director of the AIFC, emphasized that Polymetal has not only moved its operations but has also established itself as a resident and a Kazakhstani company within the AIFC. With substantial assets in Kazakhstan, including the two largest gold mining companies in the country, Polymetal’s transition to the jurisdiction of the AIFC also involved transferring its primary trading platform from the London Stock Exchange to AIX, situated within the AIFC. Consequently, global custodians have recognized AIX as a platform and regard Kazakhstan as an attractive investment market.

    Over the next two years, Polymetal aims to enhance its liquidity indicators. Although meticulous work lies ahead, the company has already made strides, with the average daily trading volume for the month reaching approximately $150,000 USD